The High Court dismissed an acquittal appeal under Section 372 CrPC as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the appellant. The trial court had acquitted the accused of Section 376(1) IPC charges.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Acquittal Aopeal N0. /2014
Apuellant/ (Victim/ Complainant) ^te: ^•""".^^""^,.,,.;<^%^^....-••Vs' 0-.3-s Versus tS<&"" Respondent 1. (Prosecution) Respondent 2.
(Accused)
Laxmi Kiran Mahant
D/o Shri H.D.Mahant, Aged about 34 years, R/o Mukam,P.O. Chhal Village^ Dharamjaigarh, nr Tahsil^^s'Civil & Revenue District - Raigarh-(C.G.)
State of Chhattisgarh Through- Arakshi Kendra, P.S.- Chhal, District - Raigarh-(C.G.) Rajaram Prajapati S/o Late Ramcharan Prajapati, Aged about 24 years/R/o Police Line, P.S. - Chhal, District - Raigarh-(C.G.)
Permanent Address .Village - Goretara, Tahsil Sohagpur, District - Shahdol-(M.P.)
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 372 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE
Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 31.07.2014 passed by the learned Additional^-^" Session. <- Judge•- (F.T.C.)y-•»• Raigarh, District RaigarK-(C.G.) in Session* Case No. 118/2009 State of Chhattisgarh Versus Rajaram Prajapati whereby respondent No.2/accused has been -'•< . .. ---' . . .-. .. / . t'. acquitte-d'of the offence punishafele U/S 376(1) of I.P.C. A copy of impugned judgment dated 31.07.2014 is annexed herewith as 'Annexure A-l'. The appellant
^^
: '•-y-'—iS^S^S^S^s^!
HIGH COURT OF CHHAniSGARH AT BILASPUR
CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI T.P.SHARMA, J. HON'BLE SHRI INDER SINGH UBOWEJA, J.
Acquittal Appeal 182 of 2014
AppellanV Victim/ Laxmi Kiran Mahant Complainant
VERSUS
Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another
Acquittai3^kppea(-u®®2]of|thg®QBe®f,CriminalProcedure. 1973
Appearanee: Shri Sudeep Verma, counsel fQB[ttieaa@Rellant. Shri Ashok Swarnakar, Panel LawyeR'feUie State.
Per T.P.Sharma, J^yiSgfp'^'to ;' •
(1) This is anacqLiiHal appeat filed against thejudgkent of acquittal dated 31.07.2014;iipassed by tHe Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Raigarh in SessiorisSFrja^MoK 418/2009, whereby the trial Court has acquitted Respondent- 2 ofthe charges underSection 376 (1) IPC.
(2) We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the judgment impugned and record of Court below.
(3) After considerable argument, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal.
(4) Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
chandra
Sd/--. Sd/. T.F.-Shamia Inder Singh Vboweia Judge Judge
Laxmi Kiran Mahant
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajaram Prajapati
T.P. Sharma
Inder Singh Uboweja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
