Single judge of the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition invoking supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, holding that preliminary issues concerning valuation and court fees are mixed questions of law and fact unfit for preliminary determination.
Writ petition dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Q IN THEHO N’BLEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARE PM;——T BILASPUR
“1C
/2013
W.P.(U/A,227)No.
/V S/o. Late gemram_/” Satyanarayan, Sharma,agedalggut80years,R/o. GasGodownMarg, Rohinipti’fam, Raipur,Distx‘ictRaipur(C.GJ»~
PETITIONER DEFENDANT
Kuber Grih Nirn’iéh Sahakari A Society Sami’ii Mawadit, RegisteredundertheChhattisgarh Societies Act, 1960, Sahakari Registratiqg N0. m—iS@Vkj—ih— its thrpugh: Vkj—@4réw@79&80 Vice President,KR Simrma, S/o. ‘Satanand Tiwari, R/g. Shankar Nagar, Near VIP Ciub, Raipur,' DistrictRaipur,Chhattisgarhxt /, aw UNDERA’i‘eggiem22vOF Tm: V‘J‘RITPE’ET! vléyl‘XTUTH‘iN01?} NDIA
“j ' ‘~ ’ Mia;
H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Patitian {Art227} N026 of 2&13
Petiiioner Defendant
Satyanarayan
Vemus
Respondent Piaintiff
Kuber Grih Nirman Sahakari Maryadit
(WritPetiiionunderArtic!e 22? of the Constitution of india)
Mr.Vikram Dixit. ccunse! for rm petitianer. None present for the respundent.
(SB: Hon’bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.)
‘k
GRnEFe
(5-7-2013)
SdlT.P.Sharma Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dismissal of the application for preliminary issue regarding valuation and court fees warrants interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Satyanarayan Sharma
Kuber Grih Nirman Sahakari Maryadit
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
