Gend Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF CHHAHISGARH AT BILASPUR W^ :…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-.'s«,
@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAHISGARH AT BILASPUR
W^ : 0'V3 of 2005' B - ©-l-Rft' ^L^; ;1^ ^ ^^.^
wrt^
PETITIONER : oXpendRam ^'
•'Sr^'
Aged about 56 years
S/o Late Shyam Ratan
,\4-y' Near Verma Kirana Store,
^
'^^•""2?,v'/^>..-''' Purana Power House, Deoridih,
/••^°>'"" J^y^ PO: Bilaspur (RS)
Dist. Bilaspur (CG)
€^.
<^..
Versus
RESPONDENT 1 .^ State of Chhattisgarh, through its
Secretary, Ministry of Labour,
Raipur (CG).
rpy^t,
-
<I-^ 2 Regional Commissioner ,
>^ Employees Provident Fund
BehindLICOffice.Pandri,
Raipur,
^"
3." The Enforcement Officer,
Employees Provident Fund
Bilaspur
4. ^" Bilaspur Spinning Mills and Industries
Ltd, Lal Khadan, Bilaspur (CG)
fe.-^^_^«7S •"w,--^" '• .^••li/f"
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226/2270FCONSTrTUT!ONOFJND!A
•^1
R. i^ray.
^tiW: W^ ^^-^873f..^...^ 20
| 3ff^?r IT?% ? ^gT^ |
^y) | |
|---|---|---|
| sn^r^r'fyri'?? WITsn^rgwi'9i |
^BTIWHfel OTCT ! |
q>rar-iTi)--i'qmaf <ife'zttfa^r; '^siRnflK?! |
| 7-10-2013 Noneforthe petitionei) Ms. Raksha Awasthy, The matter was representation on behalf of petitioner even in the second In the circumstances,! butto dismiss the petition for Accordingly, thewrit p( j p |
c v ) |
|
| Sdf- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge |
||
| GnfiOs'l |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/873/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court