Sammukh Prasad Pandey v. Bhagwati Prasad
Case brief
What is this about?
OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH WRIT…
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH WRIT…
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<>
8EKSB
j!lT!|E HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH
WRIT PETITION N0. of2005
lii;rl:!'riONER/ /" Sammuk4 Prasad Pandey, S/o
"I.AIiNTIFF
Padmakar Pandey, Aged about 45
/ years, R/o village Parsapali,
^..-^.•' Tehsil Kharsiya, Distorict Raigarh
^' ^^•":> (Chhattisgarh).
^y^^'^-^c?^-^y..-..•'-"''
, ^€.^^>^'"''
^•^^^^'
^. Versus
'^f^^L
^yy
it QNDENT/ Bhagwati Prasad, S/o Kartik Ram
yiyNDANT Sahu, Aged about 40years, R/o
village Parsapali, Tehwil
Kharsiya, District Raigarh
.-^ •^' cu?^^ ~v^ "^ (Chhattisgarh).
!^u:M ^--^ :^,
^•^.^O.'.-' W KIT^ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
<r\
XI-HG-
^T ^RI^T, ^rftw^', tar^y
| TTT^IT W^-^•^•^^ <3<i^?rT^^ (Ti:^ |
-^/^-^ ^ ^) |
|
|---|---|---|
| 3T1^f ITTf^ii^F ^ma' ^T^-RW |
^^ffw^cr 'STI^T | ^'mf^T7(t7TW^ tf t^7t Wl^:<J:U ^ ^tRi^ ^T^'?f |
| S.B. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE | PRITINKER DIWAKER | |
| ^ | 08.10.2013: Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsel Shri S.K. Tiwari, counse Learned counsel for petition. Accordingly, the petition t^ |
forthe petitioner. forthe respondent. e petitioner wants to withdraw this lis dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge |
Sammukh Prasad Pandey
Rajesh Prasad Sahu
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court