In this miscellaneous civil case, the High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed applications for condonation of delay, set aside abatement due to the death of a respondent, impleaded legal representatives, restored Second Appeal No. 911 of 1998, and disposed of the mixed civil case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SS^ Miscellaneous Civil Case No. of 2013 liljig.l0
^H»,
^
| APPLICANT | Trijugi Narayan, aged | about | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plaintiff | 63 years, son of Ramk Agrawal, Occupatio |
rishna n |
|
| JlA». <»•«<'-'1 (V^r. ^^ ^.g^^— |
Servrice, Resident of Ward, Bhatapara, Post and Tahsil Bhat District- Raipur, M.P. Chhattisgarh) |
Sadar Office apara, (now |
|
| /s. | |||
| RESPONDENTS Defendants |
Bheemsen (Since through its representatives: |
Dead), legal |
|
| 1. Amar Arya, aged 47 years. 2. Sher Singh Arya about 41 years. 3. Bahadur Arya, about 40 Years. |
about , aged aged |
||
| All son of Late Bh and resident of Ward, Near Circus G Bhatapara, Post Offi |
eemsen Bajrang round, ce and |
||
| Tahsil Bhatapara, Bhatapara , Chhattis |
District garh |
APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF SECOND APPEAL N0.911 OF 1998<<TRIJUGI NARAYAN VS. BHEEMSEN". WHICH WAS DISMISSBD AS NON COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDER DATED •^9.11.2012 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH ^OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AND FOR RECALLING OF QRDER DATED29.Il.2012.
COURT OF
Appllcant Pialntiff
Trijugt Narayan
Versus
Respondents
Bheemsen (died)
(Appiication for restoration of S.A.No.91 1 of1998)
Mr.Sour@bh Sharma, counsel for the appSicsnt.
Mr.Khitij Sharma, counsei for legai representatlves ofthe respondent.
1: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ,
ORDER
(1-8-2013)
pendlng.
Sd/T.P. Sharma Judge
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow applications for condonation of delay, instead impieading legal representatives, and setting aside abatement in Second Appeal No. 911 of 1998.
Whether to recall the order dismissing Second Appeal No. 911 of 1998 as non-compliance due to death of the respondent.
Whether to restore Second Appeal No. 911 of 1998 to its original status.
Trijugi Narayan
Bheemsen
Amar Arya
Sher Singh Arya
Bahadur Arya
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
