Dismissed

Smt.sakun Bai And Ors. v. Rajesh Vishwakarma And Anr.

Chhattisgarh HC3 Apr 2013MAC/201/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a short order in a Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The appellant sought liberty to file legally constituted advocates due to defaults. The court granted this liberty but subsequently dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file legally constituted advocates was granted. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

Smt.sakun Bai And Ors. Vs Rajesh Vishwakarma And… — Motor Accident Claims | Chhattisgarh HC (2013)

¶1

"^'WV^V'L ^^-U^'^.'.^i

¶2

^.•-LV^^-^'^^'YA-'-'t-'Z

¶3

¶4

glna^ ®

¶5

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) M.A,(ClNo. ^o-L of 2013

¶6

APPELLANTS/ :1. Smt. Sakun Bai W/o Bhagbali Chanap, aged Claimants about41 years, 2. BhagbaliChanap S/o Mansingh, aged about 43 years,

¶7

Uttam Chanap S/o Bhagbali Chanap, aged about 18 years, ,,,.< .;^<-' AII are R/o Village-Ureta, Police Station•l^1 .....•"' Doundilohara, District-Durg (C.G.)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS :1 Rajesh Vishwakarma S/o Parmeshwar Vishwakarma, aged about 30 years, R/o Seemamadhi, P.S.-Sitamadhi, DistrictNavada (Bihar) at present R/o House No. 971, Ward No. 13, Bhatapara Ward, Tatibandh, Raipur, Near Gayatri Mandir, Police Station-Amanaka, Tahsil & DistrictRaipur (C.G.) (Owner & Driver of Truck No. CG-04-J5068) 2. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Registered Head Office E-8, Rico Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaypur (Rajasthan) & Branch Branch manager, Branch Office Commercial Building, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, P.S.-Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

(Insurer of Truck No. CG-04-J-5068)

¶13

CLAIM BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL Rs.14,68,000/--—AWARD AMOUNT Rs.1,90,000/VALUATION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL Rs.12,78,000/- _

¶14

MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL U/S. 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES

ACT,1988

;C—78

	7ST "'?TPTR;TEI', ^Til-^^Ko, M^C)^.:.^Q.}. MWv[{ sht<icb •'••/TT—'T-v	[®l<niy^< J.2G.^... —'-y • •"—^ 200
	^TT^TTT?^(^f^^	T)
^S^^T R'lJcb 'WT 3?H^T sy?*iw	^RTTW;Rf^[ ^TI^?	<^i<if<n<i1'i 'RW^ff^'fe^t ipsi^K ^^tfim^TT^T
	SB: HON. SHRI N.K. AGA	ftWAL. J.
	»» J^\vn\|03.04.2013 ShriVijay Sahu, counse Shri Sahu seeks liberty to file legally constitu defaults, as pointed out by th Liberty, as prayed for, With the aforesaid lil withdrawn. Certified copy of the a the appellant on his furnishin perm	jl

Smt.sakun Bai And Ors. v. Rajesh Vishwakarma And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.sakun Bai And Ors. v. Rajesh Vishwakarma And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ratu Ram @ Rajkumar Vs Anil Das Panika and Ors.

M/s Mahaveer Construction Company Vs Naresh Kumar and Ors.

Abdul Rafiq Vs Raju Yadav and Others

Santosh Kumar Vs State of C.G and Another

Smt. Bimla Bai and Ors. Vs Ramadhar and Ors.

Smt. Jageshwari Bai and Ors. Vs Gyan Singh @ Jaanu Singh Gond and Ors.