ammi“: gm‘W W W ‘ S§ : gon’big Shri Manind[aMohgnShrivastava¥J. 11-09-2012 Shri Somkant Verma, coumsel for the petitioner. ~ Shri Y.S.Thakur’, Deputy Advocate General for the State. With the consent of learnedcounseiforthe parties,the petitionis heard tinalty. This case pertains to grievance arisingonaccountofnon—grantof retirai dues. Leamed counse appearing for the petitioner, on / instructions, submits that the matter may be referred to the High Power Retiral Dues Committee. This Court, in W.P.No.464i?J2DD4 (Ba/jinathManda!Vs.TheState of Chhaitisgarh & others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retrial dues as the disputed questionoffactswereinvoived The Committee wasconstltutedbythe State Government pursuantto h e order dated 19-06-2006 passedIn W P No 1961/2006 (Smt Keja a; Chandrakar Vs State Government - of Chhattlsgarh andothers) a d order dated 13-32008 passed In M.C.C. No.105 of 2008 (State o Chhattisgarh and othetsVs. Baijnefh Manda! and anotheij.‘ Thus, ths petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 315’ January, 2008 passed in W.P.No.4642r‘2004 (Baijnath M dal (supra)assubmittedbylearned counsel appearing for the parties This petition is accordingly disposedofinthesametermsi.e.,\the ofhce ofr the Advocate Generai is directed to send the case to the Committee, within aperiod of1 days from the date ofreceiptofcopy
