Disposed

Bhagat Ram Kanwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC12 Sept 2012WPS/3080/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner seeking regular pay scale retroactively. Court held that the matter was referred to a committee set up by the State Government to review employee grievances and regulatory pay scales. Petition disposed of without further interference.

What did the court decide?

Petition stood disposed off with directions to the authorities to refer the matter to the constituted committee and take appropriate decision within 12 days.

Bhagat Ram Kanwar Vs State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2012)

‘ }

$lng1e^Bench

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT

¶5

BILASPUR

¶6

w.P. (S) No. §a§® [2012

¶7

PETITIONER:

¶8

Bhagat Ram Kanwar, S/o. Shri Sundar Sai Kanwar, aged about 56 years, presently working as Lecturer, at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Siwni, Block— Bamhnidih, Distt. JanjgirChampa (C.G.)

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

State of Chhattisgarh

¶11

Through: - Secretary, Department of School Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (co) The Block Education Officer Block— Bamhnidih Janj gir— Champa (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur District—Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶12

WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION

OF INDIA

mw,m,m

Wm (W)

3&vm W$ am3;$§m$
	SB : Hon’ble Shri ^{Manindra Mo} 12-09-2012 Shri Ashwani ^{Shukla, cq} Shri Arun Sao, ^GovernnR Heard. By this petition, the pe authorities to grant ^reguiarpa appointment. At the very outset, ^Shri State submits ^{that the} Stat constituted a Committee Chhattisgarh, ^{Raipur, as Chai} Public Instructions, ^{Raipur, a} Member ^{to took into the}griev regular pay ^{scale from their} may be referred ^{to the said C} Learned counsel app same‘ Accordingly, the matt taking appropriate ^decision, done within ^aperiod ^{of 12} order and representation ^{of t} ln view of the ^{above, th}	^{han Shrivastava, J.} ^{unsel for the}petitioner. ^{ent Advocate for the State on advance copy.} U , titioner ^{seeks a} direction to ^{the respondent} y ^{scale to the}petitioner ^{from the initial date of} ^{Sao, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the} Government, by order ^dated 13/07/12, has omprising of Director, Public Instructions, ^{man, Deputy Director, Legal Cell, Directorate,} Member and ^{the District Education Ofhcer, as} V nces of the ^{employees with regard to}grant ^of initial date ^{of appointment. Thus,} this matter mmittee. ring for the petitioner also submits for the is referred to the aforesaid Committee for n accordance ^with law. The needful ^{may be} eeks from ^{the date of receipt of copy of}this petitioner. ^spetition ^{stands disposed off.}
Daapti	-— -VH>—-	- Manindra ^{Mohan ShrivaSmVa} Judge Sd//-

Bhagat Ram Kanwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagat Ram Kanwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.R. Sahu Vs Steel Authority of India Ltd. Ors.

Abdul Saban Khan Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Sanjay Kumar Ramteke Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Arun Kumar Maurya Durg Vs Bhilai Steel Plant M.D. and Ors.

Vishnu Ram Vs State Of C.g. and Ors.

Harihar Das Manikpuri Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.