The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, granted the petitioner permission to withdraw the petition. The writ petition was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR CORAM: Hon’ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon’ble Shri Radhe Shyam'Sharma,JJ.
W.P.(HC) NO. 8/2012
PETITIONER
Narendra Kumar Verma, Son of Late Shri MM. Prasad Verma, aged abou 53 years, R/o Bhatti Road, Kedarpur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.).
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
Appearance:
Mr. Viplaw Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for respondents 1 to 5 on advance copy.
2
w.p.(HC) No. 8/2012
’
SUNIL KUMAR SINHA,J.
ORAL ORDER (014332012)
Heard.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permissiontowithdrawthiswrit petition.
Permission granted.
Accordingly, WP. (HC) No. 08/2012 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/—
SunilKumarSinha Judge ‘ \ 1
Sdl-
Radhe Shyam Sharma Judge
Narendra Kumar Verma
State of Chhattisgarh
Amit Dubey
Sunil Kumar Sinha
Radhe Shyam Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
