The High Court of Chhattisgarh held that the writ petition was infructuous because the show cause notice had already resulted in the final order, rendering the challenge to the notice legally unviable.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M
$mgm mmh
BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION (C) No. 790 /2012 PETITIONERS : 1) Snatak Mahavidyalaya Shikshan Samiti Through Its Chairman,Snatak Mahavidyalaya Shikshan Samiti, Having Office At D.P.Vipra College, 01d High Court Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) $O\‘ $wA1 2f D.P.Vipra College through its Chairman, Governing Body, ,3» c.A“ /g’9<sup>11W D.P.Vipra College, Old High Court Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3f D.P.Vipra College through its Principal, D.P.Vipra College, Old High Court Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : IT‘ State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
'/%’ie7/%//l
of Chhattisgarh through 51y, Department of Co— qve Soc1et1es, ,DKSBhawan, tlayaRaipur (Chhattisarh l LditionalSecretary,Department wierEducation,D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
v , - wyw wnnamsgarh)
BL
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION (C) No. 790 of 2012
PETITIONERS
: Snatak Mahavidyalaya Shikshan Samiti
& Others.
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
State of Chhattisgarh & Others.
VVRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITI ITION OF INDIA
SB: Hon’ble Slu'i Satish K. Agnihotri. J.
Present: T Dr. N.K.Sht1kl¢ Senior Advocate with Shri Sourabh Shanna. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V. S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General for the State/ respondents.
O R D E R
(Passedon04mdayof October,2O 12)
The petitioner is aggrieved by the show cause notice dated 09.04.2012 (Annexure P/l), which has already resulted into passingof thefinalorder.Thus,the questionoflegalityof the show cause notice, at this stage, does not survive and as such, the petition has become infructuous.
Sdl-
SATISHK.ANGNIHO'I'RI Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition concerning a show cause notice survived the passing of the final order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Snatak Mahavidyalaya Shikshan Samiti
State of Chhattisgarh
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
