The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's application for permission to withdraw the same, which was not opposed by the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i1SB Ml'ig
:^^^^'v~»v-'.-^..S^-''sfkS-^:!: ^ss&s^^w^' gea
;w-:;-s
»n
1N_ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. AT JfiBfiLPUF <.P. NO.—J1 UO /28B0 PETITJONER AQrsws.l '^. ror: Inctus.tr.ite'-s?;; £•:. par'knershj.p firni thrbugh .it's Partner SurKsh J^sin 9/o'» Shri L .= .R =, Jal.n ^' <%Q^d rfbQut 43' year's., Occupation BusinE'sSg R/Cf. Plot • 'C', N0.200-E. Sector Ur-la Raipur (MP') 493 221.
^ii.^v^^^'
lli
33 r^--^
^J'^^^^'^r^
MS
II !f
'B
•Uilr:
VERSUS RESPONDENTSs 1. Steel ftuthority of India Ltd, a Sov<;rniTj£;'nt of India £'ntfe'r-pFi-^£• Headthl-oughOTficei't.'satManagingl-.&A\»A^co3>,.yA^':'^«dAj-ector, _ ,^ , M^nagirH-i D.irsct.Oi-""-; Bhi. i^l Sfcsc'l Plant (SHIL) Bhi3.ai (MP) . I B r a n c h M ai"i a Q e s-"". B r' a r'f c t"i S a 1 e s;Office,(SAIL), Equipment Chowk, Bhilai (MP). - ^&^ P^rtH.cr^'n^p - ^JjL.irf thrc-^qh, i.-'s—s' -Ra-"~wfi ^i-a«^-T-;s ^^^^ !=€;-ls4-&e^t . -& J.ciw-rih^T" Us Jab.urt.i i^'.r' l^-r^. MS ; PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITyTI.ON j """^CERTIORfiRI.? OF__INDIA FOR ISSUftNCE OF fl URXT IW THE NfiTURE BF' ; MANufiMUS. _DIRECTION/DIRECtIONS. ' ORDER/ORDERS •* .
--!^::.!<
z?&
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE DR. I.M.QUDDUSI & HON'BLE MR. G. MINHAJUDDIN. JJ.
W.P. No. 5986/2000
Petitioner Agrawal Iron Industries
Vs
Steel Authority of India Ltd and others
Respondents
;
Present: ; Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. B.D. Guru, coungel for respondents No. 1 & 2.
ORDER | (3rdFebruary,2012)
Per Dr. I.M. Quddusi. J;
Heard on IA No.02, application for permission to withdraw the
writ petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition. The prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the
respondents.
S-;
Accordingly, IA No.02 is allowed and the petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Certified copy today itself. Sd/I.M.Quddusi Judge •»^.:.s1
Sd/G. Judge
^
1U4-
Agrawal Iron Industries
Steel Authority of India Ltd
I.M. Quddusi
G. Minhajuddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
