Writ petition challenged orders in a revenue dispute involving land revenue cases. The Bench quashed the orders for passing a review order without recalling a subsequent pending dismissal order first.
Orders dated 28-9-99, 3-5-97, and 23-1-96 are quashed. Sub Divisional Officer is directed to take appropriate steps for reviewing both orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^SESBSW'^SW^Hre^
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIGATURE AT JflBALPUR °~] URIT PETITION N0 •4'f'^ OF 1999
URIT PETITION UNBER fiRTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTTON OF IMDIfi FOR fi URIT IN THE NfiTURE OF MfiND&MUS. eERTIQRAf?! ETC.ETC.
Inder S/o Bhalu Gadaba, Residerit; of ViIIage • Saragipal, Tahsil Jagdalpur, Distriet Bastar (F'lF') ...PETITIONER
-VERSUSl^ Cofflfnissionsr; B^.star Division,, Jagdslpur <MF')n 2. Collector-, Jasdalpur, District Bastar (MP:) 3. Sub Divisi'onal Officer, Jagdalpur- District Bastar . CMP:) Sona Son of Sonadhar Gadba, Resident of Vlllage Sargipal, Tahsil Jagdalpur Disfrict Bas.tar t:MR:> 's" 'Odaik'ant ^-/'o finirudha Jha, Resident of HTT:amij t3 Psra,BastarJagdalpur(MP_)_5—-Tahsil Jagdalpur Distri———~ ey
^-
State of Madhya Pradesh, Through it?s Secretary, Revenue Deparfrment, Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralaya, BHOPAL CMP) ..RESPONDENTS
'ilBj
^,..--;•EISt-;l
t^
^^
^
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
Writ Petition No.4757 of 1999
PETITIONER:
Inder
Versus
RESPONDENTS:
S1A
{Writ petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitutionof India}
Present:
Mr. Varun Dubey, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Abhishek Sinha, counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents No.1, 2.3and6.
None present for respondents No.4, 5, 5A & 5B, though served.
Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J
ORDER
(11-9-2012)
'^
/ ^
Page 2 of 2
W.P.No.4757/1999
l!81T|1il«n
Soma
I —^^,,ir —^^,,ir T.P. Sharma Judge
V
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer during the subsistence of a later order without reviewing the later order is legally permissible.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Inder
Commissioner, Bastar Division
Collector, Jagdalpur
Sona Gadaba
Smt. Lalita Jha
State of Madhya Pradesh
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
