Dismissed
Durga Prasad Pandey v. State of M.P. and Anr.
Chhattisgarh HCWP/1338/1999
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
m 200WW mmm ammw mmmm mmwéwfm ékawmwém mm…
What the court decided
AI extract
m 200WW mmm ammw mmmm mmwéwfm ékawmwém mm…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3C1
WW?W§f w? Nei3$§7jm 200
WW
m m matwam
| mmm ammw |
mmmm | mmwéwfm ékawmwém |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Hon’bie Shri Prashant Kumar ?.92.2012 None for the petitioner. $hri Satish Gupta, G.A. Shri B.L. Sahu, counsel The matter reoresentatlon on behalf of the No one apnears for th m the Circumstances th to dlsmlss the wnt petition for Accordingly, the wnt petl was pa |
Mishra, J. éor the State. or respondent No.2. etltloner re ls no other cation left With the ant of prosecutron Ion ls dlemrssed for want of oros tmoner even in the second call Sdl- Judge l. Ptashant Kumar ed over once in absence |
court but ecutlon Mishra of any |
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court