Division Bench dismissed withdrawn writ appeal under Section 211 of Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006, granting liberty to file permission.
Permission granted; writ appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
@
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH
CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
| W | rit Appe | al No. 315 of 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| APPELLANT Respondent No.4 |
Surguja C.G. B.P. Tiwari, s/o Jamuna aged about 59 years, Ranger, Range Lakhanpur, Division, South Surguja, |
Tiwari, Forest Forest district |
|
| Versus | |||
| RESPONDENTS | 1 | State of ChhattisgarH, thro |
ugh the |
| Secretary, Forest Depar D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G |
tment, .) |
||
| Principal Chief Conserva Forest, Chhattisgarh, district Raipur C.G. |
tor of Raipur, |
||
| Divisional Forest Officer, Division, North Surguja, Surguja C.G. |
Forest district |
||
| Petitioner n |
S.B. Pandey, s/o Ch Pandey, aged about 47 yea Ambikapur, Surguja, Surguja C.G. |
hannu rs, r/o district |
WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 211! OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT, 2006
Present: Shri A.N. Pandey, counsel for the appeilant. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 , 2 & 3.
o R D E R (11“'June,2012)
The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.
2
WritAppea: No. 315 of2o12
I 7
Certified copy of the order as per rules.
nimmi
Sd/-
Sunil' Kumar Sinha
'
Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surguja C.G. B.P. Tiwari
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajeev Gupta
Sunil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
