Allowed I.A. 7720/2012 under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC for withdrawal of the second appeal. Dismissed the second appeal as withdrawn. No order as to costs passed.
Application for withdrawal of second appeal allowed; second appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wa
•wss fla
;i :lai ti
is ilB 1SI
'^?'*^'?^-?^^1'-
CFOOOQ0152S4 J
m SSB H]&H e@EBT OiE" MABHXft 'aiABESH AT JABAIPDS
SB<3QHD;AEE>BAI. Ka. 71989
'
AK'EllaAN'CS. ,- I. RaBilcsllya wife :of Bodban»- aged, about 60 yeayi
DES'BNDAlffiSs^_, • V^. -,.;. Gast.s.;..,.-;.'..SutohaT,^ ...' - ...... .....- '.. . : . . . •• . .^ . .. ^ ,: ^., . ^' _^. : ^,
' •
' '
2.'^^Ma.fl.Fa.ai,Aairaa w/o' Sureah,^.• ' • ': aged- ': 5a!. yeara,, :. Sasts' ! - •:
V ' • • ' , ' • : .
Bo'l»li;r;lesiffl'entaof' Qrssi; Malagaoa,' Juoa Sara,.
Tahgll .Surajptlr,; Dia'b. _3uraguja« • : , ' .
l;i:l^:i KWS
^•'2, -Bpdfaaa .^/O'Eraii aged So^years^.'Ga.stie^ Ki>uimac,:r;,|:
;—...^f,./'
5.. Sur®sfa'i^'o«:liotl•lEaonn, agea 55 yeas-3, •aste:
:^--;Madrasi,;. .:~" :" ::. ; : .. •.^'^
ji.!a'ii
SBOQ®^&EPiEAI. .l!»Bi:<SEGTl'0 '1.8&-:'tffi'.'I'HE-:SODE: QB, arVa'»OaEDB8Btf'a;l
II 18 IBfii
aiE'Tqi!,;,•.!T3>-
'v'";
«!'),.
•M XI IlC—78
<i;t,.'•^^
"•' ;?iSi?"i-^
3-EST ^|<(|0i<, Ijltflyl^, [sfOlyy
l-<y'
„...5-A..: .:...^.e •WfW ^WSR WI, 20
an^r TRT* (Tpf^g^t.r)
SIT^I ~v\ h-n'b '^iN?TOh iTEH^f ^t .fest T^R5T(
^sn SIT^T ?bHi<^ ^T sifatf 3n-«'
IS.S.
rici
! 2, which is an apptication for withdravtfal
of second appeal ynder Ordq r 23 Rule 1(3)0fcpc.
OR due consideratioli, the application (I.A. No.772012) is
allowed. AppeSlants are peil r^EffsiH! iii,is?u +rti^. ^A/ifhrlrsiiA^VVUE ius isvv fh<s^iss? ^r.ascii^?ui^^ssijt ^si^'f^r's/^,SSK^-UIIU
SppSSL -"•^
Accordingly, the secor] d appea! is dismissed as withdrawn. No
order as to costs.
Sd/-
N. K. Agarwal
S3
'lIsiSteraiaitt;?'
w'itetttPWTTSl!u !;';.a
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC for withdrawal of second appeal should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicants
N. K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
