Sahadev v. Smt. Phulmati and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This second appeal challenged the decree of a Civil Judge affirming a partial decree in a suit for partition and declaration of title. The appellant claimed title based on adverse possession and disputed the maintainability of the suit under the Specific Relief Act. The Court addressed these contentions.
What the court decided
L-,/
GOURT OF CKHATTISG^
EiS'.U'gfV? '5&-S-SF'*t§*3S"'
yanaaev y/o"aKram
VK^SS S? U^/vrfUUiSti'LiU ^tUSliv^ia.i.USf. S t?TS;US?S H Jl ,H r/^*^UQ, T-*r^S^<^t3l&? tE'BU
^£t%r^inrsrgS!s.^
F^;irfE£<i»iiSi(J tSt"5 "t^il,^ •iLACr!<i;5.di*.tf ; >! !"^,f^<~l iwy^ T^. ?<Si3 •^f'^ i l5SiHu luj^^^a 1 i—i-ai. Sl i^<-i»^iu ^.i'^^'H l>^ Sh!?b(| tA s.^ ^ ii»; ^? <L A-R '-t^; v?&$sr% ^'s'^s-si 13. ^/n t tfi-i' ie'-^yi,^Jr^fcS''?S'E^<'$?'i^>t i^i~!\Sl 5 i^^^.?'! Lrfi^U'•.^dfV '•^1'"irtaffaiU U^;J^;s,^SU/^/•K;'^-/S;"-i PilStli^'t-^i.^ ar;.^Uia i^a ri«s>|^if?-rl's^ius'u.i.t^' ^;>f-fi\ S2<r'"titn»/^?/riiT!aDdiSBCS.i^i t^,i OfU£;i.<Bi. Si-tSlte'T';!^'!'^ <k5U?|isUC ? sl/'s-iift t ^'SUl!/f'f^.y* Vll.•f^a.f' [esuoHQeni,«»*).-, ,».,A ?ir^o.os.i .»,. -3 . suso^, ,^ ^. ^ siooist->,. 1-,.-,., «i. ^43^ iS ^ Sf^.'^^t^ r\r\jiV^^ 1^-ii jatiyapaii, Oc3s e3i i^j£3S ^1., LJiSlS it/i!s'P!>-i3iUii3:i 3 i '•ur."'J3. S 4s'a). Sukhs 55 years, (b) Parru, S/o Lale Ba.nl, l^I^"»t f^/Utf. fn^'S?'?**^^^3^iiaiyUcua, [i (SiiiSt^'SSJ-.»S?aj^iiii'yrsuusa,•^u^l.^.^/u L.Mss.ui^!.r^.S-^.^Iftfafr r^gsi^.^isiT-I .n ;»n^h i-S^ fw-.^.j.//"^ /r?1 't 'E1'BiVfcS^iiV^itfl-^^riiif^ r't^U^^fji-^?'ui<f~i<"tt'"-^ ?i^ir?*t'itii^fuyi.ii/'?r^ L/USiK^/lUI.^SI.^.**"f?*>i"' E^'SSS^'SB'Kf\C3i^<3S.t•h t t
(Sacond Appeai under Section 100 of CPC)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial Court committed an error in not framing an issue regarding the maintainability of the simple suit for declaration in view of defendants' pleadings.
Whether the defendant/appellant has perfected his title by adverse possession.
Whether the Courts below committed an error in decreeing the plaintiffs' suit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Yanaaev
- respondent
Phuimati
- respondent
Mukta Bai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/119/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court