This order granted a petition for restoration of M.A.C. No. 03 of 2012, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution, finding the earlier absence of counsel to be based on bona fide grounds.
M.C.C. No. 451 of 2012 is allowed and M.A.C. No. 03 of 2012 is restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^^
''At^
'^'
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
DIVISION BENCH
CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J,
M.C.C.No.451 of 2012
^ C],
Applicants Nanka Ram Sahu son of late Appellants Duleshwar Sahu, aged about 45 years, Srn}. Urmila Sahu wife of Nanka Ram Sahu, aged about 38 years, Both are R/o. village Ujiyarpur, P.S. and tahsil Manendragarh, district Koria C.G.
VERSUS
Non-aDplicants Neidhari Giri, son of Dudhnath Giri, Respondents aged about 40 years, (Driver) Dayashankar Girison of Dudhnath Giri, (owner)
Both R/o. Kotgaon, post Rampur (Bhadohi), tahsil Madiyahu, P.S. Rampur, district Jounpur U.P. Branch Manager, the New India Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, Mirjapur, Manavta Niwas, Baraighat Mirjapur, district Mirjapur U.P.
(Insurer)
A^Bijcation for restoration of IVI.A.C.No.03 of 2012.
Present: Smt. Hamida Siddique, counsel for the petitioners.
ORDER
ith (11InJune,2012)
M.C.C.No.451 of 2012
VI
The following order of the Court was passed by
Rajeev Gupta, C.J.
Smt. Hamida Siddique, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition.
o
Sd/-
ChiefJustice
Sd/-
R.N. Chandrakar
Judge
subbu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether M.C.C. No. 451 of 2012 should be allowed to restore M.A.C. No. 03 of 2012 which was dismissed for want of prosecution due to bona fide absence of counsel.
Nanka Ram Sahu & Ors.
Rajeev Gupta
Rangnath Chandrakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
