The High Court allowed the applicant's requested withdrawal of her Criminal Revision challenging an acquittal, as the State has filed a separate appeal challenging the same acquittal. The revision was disposed of as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the revision with liberty to assist the State in the acquittal appeal filed by the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, gILASP’UEV
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.SunilKumar Sinha,Jr& H 1 ‘ on’ble Mr. Rad eSh am Shafma-J
Criminal Revision No. 15812005
APPLICANT
Balmaté Naik, daughter of Shri Shivpal Naik ‘aged abduf 21 years,’ rasident of Gadhahatta,‘_ Pdh‘cef Station Kynkun} Distfict Jashpgr; I -
Versus
RESPONDENTS
Yudhishtir Pate}, ‘aged about 45 years, Assistant Sub !nspe¢tor, Police Staticn Dabha'ra, District Janjgir (CG) ‘ State of Chhattisgarh through Station? House Officer; Kunku‘ri, District Jashpur
Petition under Section 397 readwith 3eotion 401 Cr.PC
gapearinge: Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. PV.K.C." Tiwari, Sr. Advocate with Mri H.$. Patei, Advocate for respondent N01. v Mr. Akhil Mishra, Dy. Govemment Advocate for the Statelrespondent No.2.
ORAL ORDER
(07.08.2012)
Sunii Kumar Sinha, J. ‘Heard.
This revision has been filed by applicant/victim- Balmati Naik, challenging the acquittal of respondent No.1;
2 CRR 158/2005
Learned counse! for the applicant, in view of the fact that n the State has also fited Appealt No.Acquittal 326I2010‘u challenging the acquittal of responalent No.1,;seeks peryrfnissio'n‘ to withdraw this revisionwith liberty te assist the state counsel _. 3 in the above Acqulttal Appeal.
Permission granted.
Accordingly Crt Revision No.158/2005 is disposed of, as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favourofthe: applicant.
The applicant counsel may file memo of appearance on behalf of the applicant/victim i'n the above acquittal appeal filed by the State and may assist the State counselinthe said
appeal
‘
///./,
‘r
. l . Sd/-
'
Sdl- _ R.S. Sharma
2 Sunil Kumar 5mm l Judge
"
7,, Judge r’
sunha i;###f’###,sseart‘
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Balmati Naik
Yudhishtir Patil
Sunil Kumar Sinha
R. S. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
