The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a civil revision under Section 115 CrPC as not maintainable, holding that a proviso to Section 115 bars revision against orders under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
Revision under Section 115 CrPC dismissed; no orders as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HTLGH COURT OF JUDICEATURE 43.33 BEhAS'PUR (C.G-) dvil Revision Non'7‘” Of 2001 ( Manorandum of Civil Ravisicm U/s 115 of C.P.C. )
A PP LI CAN T 4., Shyam Rice Mill Par ‘ Boiling PLA IN’I‘K FF Unit"2, ?r0p. Anil Agxawal s/o Shri Raaheshyam Agrawal, R/O Neora, Tahsil and DistrictrRaipurs
Versus
N3 ° Mah en dra singh sawann i, SS Gretary Kri shi Upaj Man di Neo ra, Tah 5il ami Dis tri (:t Raipurg \ M EMORAN DUM OF CIVIL REVESION UNDER SECTION 115 OF CaPLCa
/i<«., v
HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARHATBILASPU R Civii Revision Na. 7110f 2801
APPILECANT Fiaint£ff
Shyam Rice Min ParBoilingUnit2
r
VERSUS
NON—APPLICANTS 1 Krishi Upaj Magdi
Defe: dams
2 Dogendra Naik
3 Mahexzdra SigghSanwarmi
[CivilRevisionundarSection115of theCOdeof CivilFrocsdure]
Presnt:e
K
gNone appears on behalf oftha applicant.
None appears 9nbehalfofthenon—appiicants.
SB: Hon’ble Mr.T.P.Sharma,J.
ORDER
(Passedon11.09.2612)
By t.i. civil revision,applicanthaschallengedthelegality & proprietyof i the Ogder dated l0.09.2001 passedbythellndAdditionalDistrictJudge, Raipuy in Civil SuitN9.14-A/2001,wherebyapplicationunderOrderl Rule 10 ofthe CedeoCivil fProcedurehasbeenclismissed.
Chandre
Censidering the natureof order&insertionof pi‘ovisotoSection.115of the Cede (if Civil Procedure,1908therevisionisnotmaintainableandis x\ \’ t/ hereby dismissed. Noordersastocost.
Sd/-
’ T. P. Sharma Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision under Section 115 CrPC is maintainable against an order dismissing an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shyam Rice Mill Par Boiling Unit 2
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
