Dismissed

Municipal Corporation Raipur v. Mukund Lal Dewangan and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC26 Nov 2012CR/41/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the Municipal Corporation, Raipur to withdraw multiple Civil Revisions filed under Section 392 of the C.G. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, subject to the liberty to file a review petition. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of Civil Revisions No. 41-49 of 2011 allowed with liberty to file a review petition against the order dated 20-01-2011.

Municipal Corporation Raipur Vs Mukund… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HONLBLE HI6H^O_URTOF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR

¶2

CIVIL REVISION N0......3.1....... OF 2011

¶3

CIVIL REVISION UN&ER SECTEON 392 OF THE C.6. MUNICIPAL CORPORATtON ACT, 1956^'

¶4

Petitioner Municipal Corporation, Raipur through the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

-<<•

Versus

Respondents

Mukund Lal Dewangan, S/o Late Shri Mehattrlal Dewangan, R/o New Hanuman Nagar, near Durga Temple, Lakhenagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶9

Rajesh Upadhyay, Sarpanch (appointed u/s 387(2) of the C.6. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956), Advocate Chamber No. 5, District Court, Raipur (C.6.)

¶10

¶11

Dinesh Tiwari, Panch (appointed u/s 387(2) of C.G. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956) S/o Shri Lalmani Tiwari, R/o Ramsagarpara, Raipur (C.&.)

¶12

he petitioner humbly begs to submit as under;-

¶13

HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶14

CIVIL RBVISION N0. 41 OF 2011

¶15

PBTITIOMBR : Muaicipal Corpoiattfou, Raipur Versus RESPOKDENT8 Miikund Lal Dewaagau aud ofhcrs.

¶16

CIVIL RBVI8ION N0. 42 OF 2011 PBTITIOKER : *lmucipal Corporatiou, Raipur Versas ' RESPONDEKTS Raghveudra Rai and others. CIVIL REVISIOM MO. 43 OF 2011 PBTITIONBR : Mumclpal Corporation, Raipur Versus

¶17

RESPONDBNTS Dipak Kmaar Shrivastava aud others.

¶18

CIVIL REVISIOK MO. 44 OF 2011
PE?riTIONE?R : Municipal Corpoiation, Corpoiation,

¶19

Municipal Corpoiation, Corpoiation, Raipur Versua

¶20

Rauu'ao Seudre aud others.

¶21

CWIL RBVISION KO. 4S OF 2011
PBiTITIOMER : Municipal Corporatioa, Raipur
v<aaiu
RBiSPONDBllTS : LaxailBarayau Sahu aad oth.ers.
•^'"
CtVIl. RBVI8ION NO. 46 OP aoii

¶22

PE?riTIONBR : Mujcucjpal Corporation, Raipur
Versus
KBSPOIIDBNTO Vimal Kiuuar Phutan and ofhers.

¶23

•.'.'fSSS^gSSSiS^ii

¶24

T- -

¶25

CFffll, REVISIOK.NO. 47 OF 2011

¶26

PETITIOKBR \ ; Miuucipal Corporation, Raipur

¶27

Versus

¶28

RESPONDBMTS

¶29

Viiual Chaadra Jaia aad ofhiers.

¶30

cnni. RBVISION NO. 48 OF 2011

¶31

PBTITIOKER ; Miuucipal Corporation, Raipur

¶32

Versns

¶33

RESPONDBNT8

¶34

Jj[tendra Kumar Wadhwaai aad otbers.

¶35

CreiL REVISION MO. 49 OP 2011

¶36

PBTITIOMER : MuBiicipal Corppratioa, Raipur \ : Versus . RESPON^KSS MotUal Dewaugaa auud ofhei's.

¶37

CIVIL RBVISION8 UNDERSE<~riOn 392 OFTHE CHHAmSGARH MUmCIPAL CORPORATIOH ACT. 19S6

¶38

SB : HOM'BIE SHRI ABHAY MAMOHAR SAPRE. J.l

¶39

Preseat: Shri UNS Deo, couasel for the appUcaat. Shri Devershl Thakur, counscl fer fhe respondeats/ aoa-applicants.

¶40

OR&L ORDBR (Passed on 26*'' day ofMovembet, 2012)

¶41

This order sbaU goveia ftie disposal ofCiffil Reviaioas filed by fhc petltioner - Mumcipal Corpoiatun, Raipur, under Sectton 392 of fhe C.G. Mtuucipal Corporatton Act, 1956, bearlag Noa. 41/2611, 42/2011, 43/2011, 44/2011, 45/2011, 46/2011, 47/2011, 4&/2011 & 49/20rl, as tfaey aU arJse out oftlieordeidated 07-507-2010 by Dlstfict Judge, Ralpur iu passed Ai-bitiaUon Case N0.57-A/2008, 59-A/2008, G4-A/2008,

¶42

¶43

54-A/ 2008, 56-A/ 2008, 63-A/ 2008, 62-A/ 2008, 61-A/ 2008 & 60-A/2008respectively. ~~~~._

¶44

•\

¶45

The petitioner is permitted to wifhdraw fhese revisious wlth liberty to filc a review petition. ^ainst tbe oider dated 20-01-2011 passed in Arbitratton No. 27/2010 andottttr connected appeals which were dispoaed of by that oupder under Onler 47 Rule 1 ofthe CPC to enable the Review Court to decide the revlew ia accordauce wlth law on the grounds taken therein.

¶46

3 Certified copy of the impugaed oider be returned to the learned couusel for the hte furiushing au petitioner on authenticated photo copy oftfae same iu the record offhe c&se.

¶47

No costs.

¶48

Sd/AbSiay Manohar Sapre Judge

¶49

¶50

..s'
)S:

Municipal Corporation Raipur v. Mukund Lal Dewangan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Municipal Corporation Raipur v. Mukund Lal Dewangan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munmun Mandal S/O Ugra Mandal Vs Anil General Stores

Mohan Lal Vs Savitri Bai and Anr.

Jagdish Kumar Agrawal Vs Union Bank of India

Uday Kant Jha and Ors. Vs Commissioner, Jagdalpur and Ors.

M/S Hari Ram Agrawal Vs Smt.Saraswati Devi

The New India Assur.Co.Ltd. Vs Smt. Dhara Devi Singh and Ors.