Goverdhan Prasad Nirmalkar v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment records the petitioner's submission in a writ petition under Article 226 concerning his deputation and alleged suspension. The petitioner sought orders based on the invalidity of an interim directive.
What the court decided
é (1)
WxW
$€M§LE BEM‘M
IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURTOFC.6.ATBILASPUR
W. P. S No. <0 of 2010
/ PETITIONER : Goverdhan Prasad Nirmalkar,S/o LaTe Shri Nakul Nir‘malkar‘, aged abouf 49 year's, workingasHelper, R/o Irrigm‘ion Colony, QuarterNo. A-1/7, Darri, Dis’rr‘icf-Kor‘ba (6.6.) VERSUS '. RESPONDENTS : 1.‘/S’ra’re of Chha‘r’riSgar‘h Through The Secre’ror‘y, Wafer Resources Deparfmem‘, SecreTaria’re, D.K;S. Building , Raipur (6.6.)
- 2./ The Engineer-ineChief, Wafer Resources Deparfmen’r, Sihava Building, Raipur HC‘hho‘r‘risgarh,
- (C.G.)
- 3./The Collec’ror, Korba , Disf’r.Korba (C.G.)
- 4.6 The Sub—Divisional Officer (SDO), Hasdeo Barage Wafer Management Rampur Disl‘r. Korba (C.G.)
- The ExecuTive Epgineer, Haseod Barage Wafer Management, Rampur Disf‘r. Korba (C.G.)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to an appropriate writ order regarding his deputation and suspension.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to declare the impugned interim order dated 15.11.2009 as without prejudice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Goverdhan Prasad Nirmalkar
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh
Coram
Satish K. Agrahari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPS/5070/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court