This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution as having been rendered infructuous. The State did not dispute this observation.
Petition dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.tsy.Mas S 'HFI
Sil'liti-.s. @l-8'
^r~sm--"
^L
^f^a^
IIL THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION fC} No. ^35^ /2008
PETITIONER
r~
RESPONDENTS ,1
.
y'
^21
3,
^Q' '^
.^ >•
0 /
S.R.
^ A;
.;i
^ '^t^
Sm^
Prem Prakash Banjare, aged about40 years, S/o SheiGoverdhan Banja.re, R/o village and Post Girhola, TaHsil Dhamda, - . . Distf.-Durg, ;
VERSUS
The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Panchayat Department, D.K. S. • ^ Bhawan, Raipur .. AdditioriaLGollector, Durg Sub Divisional Officer! :, (Reyenue),' : / :. ''.'? •Dilstt.:.Durg:': : ;':: .
Pawan Kumar Banjare,aged about :38 . yeaps, S/ o Limukda, Gram. S
Patichayat; Girhola, BloGk;Dha.mda,?Distt.; •Durg .",''.' ' :, . ::.••' •'l.:^ !':' ' :,:
WRITPEtlTIONUNDERARTICLE226AND2270'FTHE CONSTITUTlONOFINDlIA
II f S ! ';B8
HC-22
^~
^^ •<ii<i]<n<i, STil'M'is, f«<c(iyy<
'^.^-^h.t^0^I'q3?
<ifCTi aitiitti 200
f^a- ^'
sn^r^i
l^iwaii^r an^i'^R'iWHfOT •*wf<-i<fl-i wwi ^ fe^-^nere
wira'^ifta
^? aipgn aii^r
SB : Hon'bte Shri Manlndra MohAn Shrivastava. J.
IO-OI-MII
Shri Yogesh Chandra, coun^el forthe petitioner.
Shri Satish Gupta, G.A. for fie State,
Learned oounset fbr the petjtioner submits that this petition has been
rendered infructuous.
Not disputed by learned coijinsel for the State.
Accordingly, the petition js dismissed as having been rendered
infructuous.
Sd/-
Tuman'
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge
[^S ^feA
Prem Prakash Banjare
The State of Chhattisgarh
Pawan Kumar Banjare
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
