Petitioner filed an application for withdrawal of the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly. No substantive legal issue was decided.
Allowances withdrawal of the Writ Petition and disposal of the same as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH,B_ILASPQR ~ :v 'V W340) No.58412009 w
‘ - PETITIONER Moojchand Vanna, aged-60 yams, son of Shri Balaram Vema,‘msident of vmage and post offica— Rohrahala, " Tahsu Pathanya, District Bilaspur (CG) . Ve’sus , . ‘5“ RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh,‘through thr. ‘S’ecretaryfDepa'rkment ' bf’ Fatestr Raipur. The Principal Chief Consewgtor of V Forat Chhattwgarh Ralpur i ‘ The Conservator of Forest Bilaspurd Circle Bilaspur (CG) .....a The Dlvrswnal Forest 0fticer ‘ Bllaspur Division Bilaspur (CG)
r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE GONSTITUTION OF . INDIA
Appearance : 'Shri Somnath Verma Advocate for the Patmonor. « Shn Satrsh Gupta Government Advocat’e’f for: he Statelrespondents W; r omvoRoER :.o(os.os.2o11)
r SUNIL KUMAR SINHA J
‘5 Heard on I A No 2/2011 I A No 2/2011 has been fled by the petitioner for wuhdrawa! of the
I Writ Petition Thus rs sugported by an affidavrt of the petitioner
Shri Gupta learned counsel for the Stat has no objection in
Withdrawal of the Writ Petition I.A.No.2l2011, therefore. is allowed and the Writ Petition is
disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Sunil Kumar Sinha
Judge
ys
Moojchand Vanna
State of Chhattisgarh
Sunil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
