Dismissed

Pandit Sushil Kumar Dubey and Anr. v. Bisesar and Others

Chhattisgarh HC5 Aug 2011WP227/4333/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Under Article 227, the Bench dismissed a writ petition challenging the Additional District Judge's dismissal of an application to record documents at the evidence stage. Finding no necessity to record documents, the writ was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition challenging the dismissal of the application to record documents under Order 7 Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 CPC was dismissed.

Pandit Sushil Kumar Dubey and Anr. Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2011)

¶1

flO

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR

¶3

WRIT PBTITION (2271 N0. 4333 OF 2011

¶4

	PBTITIONERS	1. 2.	Paadit Sushil Kumar Dubey, aged about42 years, (PlaintiffNo. 1) Pandit Narendra Kumar Dubey, aged about36 years, Bofh sons of Kartik Raia, R/o Bhoghapara, Shivrmarayaa, TaIisU Pamgarh, Disfarict Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). (PlaintiffNo.2)
		VER8US
	RBSPONDENTS:		Bisesar, S/o Balram, aged about 48
			years R/o Maliaatpara,
			, Shivnnarayaii, Tahsil Pamgaili,
			DistodctJanjgir-Champa (C.G.). (Defeadaut No. 1)
			Jagaiinath, S/o Bhaiigi, aged about 90 yeai-s, R/o Sagar, Tahsil Takhatpur, District BUaspur (C.G.). (Defeadaat No. 2)
			Vijay Kumar, S/o Shukul, aged about
			59 yeas, R/o Bemchasadi,
			Maliasaoiudn, Near Railway Station,
			TahsU and Distdct Mahasainudn
			(C.G.).
			(Defeadant No. 3)
		4.	Khagendra, ageda bout 52 yeai's, S/o
			Shuktd,
w			(Defendaat No. 4)
			Mohaa, aged about 54 yeas, S/o Shukul,
			(Defendaat No. 5)
			Respondent No» 4 & 5 bofh are
			Resident of VUlage Sonadula, Post
			Kaifha, TahsU BUaigarh, Distdct
			Raipur (C.G.).
			Deepak, aged about 20 years, S/o
			bharat Dubey, R/o Village Pakanya,
			VIiay Rahoud, TahsU Pamgarh,
			DistrictJanjgii'-Champa (CG)
			,,. (Defeadast No. 6^
			Rameshwar, S/o Parasram, aged
			about 59 years R/o Near Puraaa
			, Sirgitti Talab, In front ofTraiisformer, Tahsilaad District Bilaspur (C.G.). (Defendaat No. 7)
		8.	Shri Laxminarayan Maixdir,
			Mahaatpara, Shivrmarayaa, Tahsil
			Nawagarh, District Jaujgir-Champa (C.G.):
			Through: flie Maaager/Collector, Janjgir-Cham.pa (C.G,). (Defeadaat No. 8).

F TT

—^-

///

'f
",y/
".^

WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLE 227 OP TH®CONSTITUTION OP INDIA,

¶10

(SB :Hon?ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.)

¶11

Present:- Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, Advocate for the petitioners. Respondents not noticed.

¶12

ORAL- ORDBR

¶13

(Passedoa^OS/08/2011)

¶14

By this petition under Article 227 of fhe C/onstitution of India petitioners have chatlenged fhe legaMty and propriety of fhe order dated 5/7/2011 passed by Additional Disttiet Judge, Jaajgir (C,G.) m civil suit No. 14-A/2007 whereby appUcation for takiag docunients on record at the stage of evidence filed on ^ behatf of the petitioners/plaiatiffs under Order 7 Riile 14(3) read wifh Section 151 ofthe Civil Procedure Code, 1908 has been dismissed by tlie Court below, 2. Shri Malay Kumar Bhaditd, Advocate for the petitioners is heard. 3. Order mxpugned, copy ofatleged list ofdocuments and appUcation perused. 4. On close scintiny offhe documents alleged to be filed before the Court below that too at fhe stage of evidence, I do not find aay necessity for taking such docunients on record for provuig the case of the plaiatiifs/petitioners or aay ground for raterference ia exercise of supeivisoiy jurisdiction. CtonsequenUy, petition is Uable to be dismissed aad is hereby disiaissed.

¶15

AU nitermi applications are also disinissed,

¶16

No order as to costs.

¶17

Sd/T.P. Sharma Judge

¶18

It^

Pandit Sushil Kumar Dubey and Anr. v. Bisesar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandit Sushil Kumar Dubey and Anr. v. Bisesar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Ramin Bai Vs Nazru and Ors.

Kailashchandra Agrawal Vs Mangatrai Agrawal and Ors.

Smt. Shashi Dubey Vs Ashok Prasad Sinha and Others

Nankishore Yadav and Ors. Vs Gujbati Bai and Ors.

Raymond Ltd.Akaltara Now Mumbai Vs State of C.G. and Ors.

Janak Ram Vs Sukhlal and Another