Halalkhkor v. Sukhdei and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Misc. CivilCase…
What did the court decide?
Application allowed; Second Appeal No. 301/92 restored.
CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Misc. CivilCase…
Application allowed; Second Appeal No. 301/92 restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^
HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
Misc. CivilCase No.735 of 2010
APPLICANT/: Halalkhor, S/o Nohar Singh Marar, aged (Appellant) about 40 years, R/o Village Kasawahi, Tahsil Kanker, District Bastar M.P. (nowC.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS/: 1. Sukhdei,Wd/oLatkhor (Plaintiffs) 2. Mehtaruram,S/o Latkhor 3. Mehtarinbai, D/o Latkhor 4. Kaushalyabai, " 5. Kalabai, 6. Puniyabai, No.3 to 6 are minor, through their mother no.1 Sukhdei, All are R/o Village Kasawahi, Tahsil Kanker, District Bastar M.P. (now C.G.) 7. The State of M.P. (now the State of C,G.), through the Collector, Bastar, M.P. (now C.G.)
{ApplicationforrestorationoftheSecondAppealNo.301of1992}
Present:
Mr. Nitesh Pant, counsel forthe applicant.
Mr. U.K. Singh Chandel, Panel Lawyerforthe State/non-applicant No.7.
Single Bench: Hon'ble IVIr.T.P. Sharma, J
ORALORDER (3-1-2011)
\ ' ' • '•'...• . ' ^ . '• •
Soma
Sd/T.P. Sharma Judge
Halalkhor
Sukhdei
State of Chhattisgarh
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court