Hearing an application for restoration of First Appeal No.210/1995 which had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The court restored the appeal to its original number considering it was based on bonafide grounds.
Restored First Appeal No.210/1995 to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
'.^•^ ^ac^':<^^ ?-• ..........^.l
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MISC. CIVIL CASE NOH^I OF 2011
APPLICANTS/
APPELLANTS
^-^fy^..-^
^•'€^^A[?1^--e^" ^^ "^-1 ^'
K^
All residents ofAkbarKhan Ki Chaal, Idgah Road, Juni Line, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
VERSUS
NON-APPLICANrS 1. RESPONDENTS
District Police Superintendent Bilaspur.
APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF FA N0.210/1995 BY_RECALLING ORDER DATED 13/07/2011 f-ASSED IN FA N0.210/1995'SND RBSTORATION OF FIRST APPEAL ^_21P^_199S ,(ABDUL RAHIM KHAN -SINCE DEAD THRU' INAMUR RAHIM KHAN 8& 3 OTHERS VS. STATE 0_F MP-NOW CG 8& OTHERS) TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER.
Applicants/appellants, above named, respectfully beg to subrnit as under:-
-HC—78
~3"oET -q|q|<r1^ ^TTl^^Ko, [®i<ni<4^<
(U'
^PTt'TT (hHlch
l'C;C...MT>.:..
200
3TT^T TT^^ (1iclf3s^)
|3TT^T^T f^'lioh
WT 3iTI^TsF^W|WTTW^f^T 3Pf1^T|^Tq^Rh-RT^if^fft^T?W?K
'^^tfOT33|7^T|
|---|---|---|
||S,B:HJON9BLEMR,^UST
08.08.2011:
Mr. Ashish Shrivastav
Mr. SanjeevAgrawal,
Counsel forthe petitioi|
|^^^^^
, counselforthe petitioner.
'Lforthe State.
^eris heard on restoration application.|
|^|The
petitioner
is
N0,210/1995 which was disrt
dated 13.07.2011.
On due consideration
for the petitioner and the grj
am
satisfied
that
the
abq
13.07.2011 when First Appe
was based on bona fidegroi^
M.C.C. No.477/2011,
No.210/995 is restored to its
^
j
^
(
|iissed
sunds
^l
nds.
|original
eeking
restoration
of
First
Appea!
forwant of prosecution vide order
ofthe submission ofthe learned counsel
taken in the restoration petition,
1
ence
of the
petitioner's
counsel
on
No.210/1995 was taken-up for hearing
(therefore, is allowed and First Appeal
number.
Sd/-
N.K.Agarwal
Judge|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first appeal passed against the impugned order should be restored to its original number.
Inamur Rahim Khan & Ors.
State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
