"8. Exereise of power undsr Section 482 of the Code in a case of this nature is the exception and not the mie. The Section does not confer any new powere on the High Court. tt only saves the inherent power which the Court possessed before the enactment of the Code. it envisag^s three circumstances under which the inherent jurisdiction may be exercised, nameiy, (i) io give effect to an order under the Code, (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of court, and (iii) to otherwise secure the ends of justice. tt is neither possibte nor d^irable to lay down any inflexible rule which would govern the exercise of Inherent jurisdiction. No ieglstative enactment dealing with procedure can provide for ail cases ihat may possibly arise. Gourts, therefore, have inherent powers apart from express provjsions of taw which are necessary for proper discharge of functions and duties imposed upon them by taw. That is the doctrine which flnds expression in the section whteh mereiy recognlzes and preserves inherent powers of the High Courts. All courts, whether civil or criminal possess, in the absenceof any express provision,asinherentintheirconstitut'ion,ai!such powersas are necessary to do the right and to undo a wrong in course of administration of justice on the principie"quando Isx aliquid alicui concecEt, concedsre videtur etid sine quo res ipsas esse non potesf' (when the law gives a person anything it gives him that without which it cannot exist). While exercising powere under the section, the court does not function as a court of appeal or revision. inherent jurisdiction under the section though wide has to be exercised sparingiy, carefully and with caution and only when such exercise is justifted by the teste specifteally laid down in the section itself. tt ts to be exercised ex debito juslStiae to do real and substantial justice for ihe administration of which alone courts exfst. Airthonty of the court exists for advancement of justtee and if any attempt is made to abuse that authority so as to produce injustice, the
