Criminal Misc. Petition filed to quash the dismissal of a F.I. complaint by the learned Magistrate, alleging gross illegality and perversity in dismissing the case without cognizance under Section 195 Cr.P.C.
Petition disposed off. Petitioner at liberty to move appropriate application under Section 195 Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
INTHE MiGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARMATBILASPUR
Cr.M.P.No. ^t^ / 20M
PETITIONER Jaiprakash Shukla, S/o Late Shri G.P. Shukla, aged cibout 51 years, Ex. ^..••••••'^' C.E.Q.; Jttnpad Panchayat, •'''^;^£.^Lftl""<"'" Jaijaipur, R/o. Behind Scii Mandir, pA.w^ ^ .T£sJ&'^<^Daganiya, College Ward, Raipur, (tresertsl a*.... .....^•r-\ Tahsiland District-Raipur(C.G.). Versus RESPQNDENTS/ 1. Shivratan S/o Awadhram Chandi-a, NON-APPLICANTS/ Village Bhatmahul, Post - Pirda, PRQPQSED ACCUSED Tahsil —Jaijaipur,Jaijaipur, Distri<st - Jdnjgir-
Shivratan S/o Awadhram Chandi-a, Village Bhatmahul, Post - Pirda, Tahsil —Jaijaipur,Jaijaipur, Distri<st - JdnjgirChampQ (C.G.) R.L. Rgtre, Advocate, R/6 JdijQipur, P.S. & Tahsil— Jaijaipur, Oistfict - Janjgir-Champd (C.G.).
CRIMINALMISCELLANEOUSPETITIONUNDERSECTIQN482 QFTHECQDE.QFCRIMiNALfROCEDURE ,'
I:!!
K iBtfti ISi
B
s
•;?sr •^iTqT^R, -®iriTm-s,f^roy
. ^y-.nf.^.^lS/Z^^
E,(i°<;
| a^wlyn^ wian^rwiiNi |
"SB'TTI'i | ^Fif'ra^VFT^i4fSV .'^i^fi •^ 'sRp'i sn^i |
|---|---|---|
| onoe 5nrn8&nindra'Blo1ia]i 02-11-2011 |
~Sh7Jva5t5va,J. | |
| -.- -. _L | Shri S. C. Verma, counsel for | Heard on admission. This petition has been filed Magistrate, learned counsel for thej Magistrate has committed gross ill ( dated 16-09-2011, by which, compl dismissed bythe learned Magistrate} Assailing the correctness ani |
iwiwng—rs/140—2/2011—i,so,ooo.
T5? ^TqRTO, '^iT.^FR', I^RTy:
J^ BE=
sn^i 'vss'v (Tpf^^i; ?
| ss^wf^n^i •wiai^i'ann^ |
•S^iiwaittTan^i <L-' —SecGoiT'S~^~5T\K5"VTP^' wiferahSFraf '=?fs'CT •T??siCTit' ^- 3''!WS 311^1 |
|---|---|
| / Tumane are-'cnWiigmitCT, |
TO5TI),, bai] application, which has been concerned Court has not taken any |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned Magistrate committed a gross illegality by dismissing a complaint based on Section 195 bar without taking cognizance.
The validity of the objection regarding false statements made to oppose bail application under IPC Sections 120-B and 173.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jaiprakash Shukla
Shivratan
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
