Dismissed
Mahesh Ram Gavel v. Rajesh Pandey and Another
Chhattisgarh HCCONT/384/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This single-judge bench held that no contempt was made out as the impugned order did not direct respondents to take a decision on the petitioner's representation. The Court treated the inaction as a matter of remedy under existing law rather than contempt, disposing of the petition finally with no undertaking.
What did the court decide?
Petition finally disposed of; no contempt found; petitioner advised to approach concerned respondent to file representation if aggrieved.