This writ petition challenges the delay in granting the Madhukant benefit to petitioner employees. The High Court directed the authorities to dispose of the pending cases and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.
Case of petitioners to be considered and appropriate orders may be passed after verification of facts within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
' ' w?r1 1k I f
1 ,; é ’ i i a I l 1
E x i Ii l, _ : i
Ir1
g
C/o f;
IN THE HON’BLEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH AT . ‘‘ ‘ BILASPUR _ WRIT PETITION 1S)No.015$ [2009
\R.B.Marabi, /13. h (Sf.Lecturer)S/oLate Shri DeoNarayaxLRam,ageabout5’1 . ‘ Block Education O$ce13 years, Wadrafnagar,Dis ict—Sul‘guja (C.G.) / 14. Harihar Prasa Singh, (Sr.L,ec'turer) S/o Late ShriR. .Singh, ageabout52 Block Edu.ationOmcer,Odag'a; years ' District Surguja (CG) A5. S r JabWau, \S Lceuncx; S/O Law Shn R D Ja1swa1 age about53 years, Block Educatio O$cery Batauh',’ Disu‘ict—Surg'uja (C.G.) S.K.Dwivedi; Principal) S/o Shn /16. T.R.Dwivedi, aged about 43 years Block Education Omcer, Sonhat, District—Koriya (C:.G.) B.L.Shrivastava, (Sr. Lecturer) S/‘o /17. Shn' age about 55 S.L.Shrivasta’va, Block Education O$ce13 years, Bharatpuf,Disttiict~Koriya (C.G.) 2 Ix VERSUS RESPONDENTS 4. State of Chhattisgarh 7 Thlough Secretaly r Department of Tribal Welfare Ucpai LILICKIL, lVldIlLl dldyd, UIXD w\”5 Bhawan, Ralpur (CG )
Pnncrpal Secretary
i‘ ‘ HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH BILASP UR i z 1 i PINERSETTIO ’the W ’“‘ rh& ©g$ RESPONENTSD I (VrIt petitionuner d Article 2_ p t on df India ) r relylng o n Atrhe veryoutsef learned counse appearln ,fortheState submltsthattheIssueof grant of the avermentsmademthereturn 1 n Madhuknta bgenefltto the petrtlonersgas.per 7 ‘ ‘ i’s pendmg and thesamesa htl be consrderatlo Ibefore‘theFrnanceDepartme L‘s ldered and deCIded expedrhou sly” Tshu th is pellontt , is A !» hrs Juncture learned counselappearingforthepetrtronerssubm ltsi atithe Issue Is pending consideratr o‘ efo re teh resondenpt a uthorrtlesformorethanoneyear as n deCISIonhas been tknae: h en‘thelawhasbeenlsettledbytheSupre e C ourt onthis s ue; other Slmllarlysituatedemployeesh a [at once thelawIssettledIno n L: L I, ,f_
i é 3 . I n Iew o f th e submlss:ons made by the learned counsel apearinpg $ fo r the State that the matter Is pendlng onSIderatIon before the, F inance Department the petition Is disposed of wrth a direction to the respondentit authorltles that the case of he perronerstt may be H coder>nsted t and approprlate orders may be passed In acrcodance With law an d on rts own merrts subtjec o verrflcatron of facts wrthrn a period ofsrxweeks from the'date of recerpt‘of a copy of'thjs
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to immediate grant of Madhukant benefit pending consideration by the Finance Department?
Whether the law on the grant of Madhukant benefit has been settled by the Supreme Court of India?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.N. Yadav and Others
State of Chhattisgarh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
