, The High Court dismissed the pending writ petition after the petitioner failed to appear in hearing for two consecutive summons. Despite earlier show-cause notices, the absence was deemed total without representation.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 111111111111111111341111111 | &1u 33w 3E. Eq mlmm 111.1111111 . A \R\_ kmkau w |
|---|---|
| qjsmamgvoiwm wm‘i. gammy " 3mm mam"Wm 3&3 mama azwq. <br>,“Ed.£3 gqgq Mam; .a w 323 mg? «1g34a3:3 wmaE muma um“:5%3.M?w.W a? §§ En wag WE? Eng. ~3m4,?.mg mg? am‘qg gmkimg nag. ‘ a? i£s wag, 4% myw. w $1q§m 3%. <br>m3. in? 3a.? 3mm xg , .gaj .wmagqq Wmw m , maaway gs igwgummdwnxamgmw “ r, . I |
IWWWW W
. . ....m.t3.C¢.).3.é..é...z./n‘ mm‘ m 200
mm13 wm m mm? Hfsa % am am i £3 I- Hon’me 5hr: Manmdra Mohan abrivastava, JR ;/.— 42am \ When the matter was caHec‘ é for hearing, none, appeared for the =petitioner/s and the mattér was passe‘ d over. Even in the second mund, none appears for the petitioner/s. R - §gi§_4.-g_e,§i:g§fr£;{gf§lHe State. ‘ Earlier SPO. was issued to th‘e petitionerls. Since no one appears far th e petitionerle and no representation v made on hisitheirbehalf, the petition a dismissed fer want of prosecution. r i Sd/r i ManindraMohanShriva‘stava i i Judge r t J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner failed to appear.
Petitioner/s
State
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
