R.S.Bhati v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
THE F1AOHYA PgftOESH STATE AOraiNISTSAnVE…
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner.
THE F1AOHYA PgftOESH STATE AOraiNISTSAnVE…
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^^-^^
lll 1
'^
fL^\ (r^
IN THE F1AOHYA PgftOESH STATE AOraiNISTSAnVE T8IBUNAi£
-!w
^
| PglMa | PAi 8 | E CH AT 3ABALPUt |
|---|---|---|
| ORIQINAL | APPL | XCATION NO,^"^ttB; OF 1998 |
| PETITIONE8 S |
Rav S/o Eiig No, Trik |
ifidra Sx^gh Bhatxi agad 43 y©ar©ii Shri ChandrabhaR Singh Bhati, Assft*' tneBry 8«E<3^ ^ Atpres@nt Stib Qivision 2, Resident of House of Sbri R<S<»Dixit, one Chavraha Kedarp^i?^ Aiibikapyr, -UERStJS- ll |
| RESPONOENTSi | 1» | The Stateof Nadhya Prad@sh-fchx?ovgh tN©Secretary to the Panchayat & Rural Development OQparfcment^ So^t^ of R»P« Bhopal^ |
| 2^ | V»K^ 3ain^ ExQcvtive ErigineBr^ 8»E<»S»Deparfeaent Dindorio' |
|
| 3^ | ShaUendra Singhy Executive E^gi^©B^j R<iEo3« 3hahdol«i |
|
| 4* | N»K«Badkyl, Exscyfcive Eaginesr,1 R«E»S«Thikri - Oharoi (Tlirough EE RES Oha^l |
|
| 5^ | AK^ Shrivastava^ Exacative Engin©@F, R<E«S Satna» |
|
| 6^ | P^S^ Shar^a, Execubive Enginee^ R^E^S^ Bemetra - Durgl |
OELTMLS OF APPl.ICATISN
{.f^
/
-3^ r^|<l||^. ^Tl1^<l(0. tc&«v11^ll<
31lif?T 'TSra?
INJ t&2.^.:.m^ "^
^l^^l ^hHlch 200
'fN^T'
3:n^T^F)T chi1Liid41ri ^i^d'T'^f^st <F?i-^i<
f^ri^F^n^ ^n^T ^enw^rftn
^aTp^m^n^r
^^ict»^rficT
^,. " ^' SB: Hon'bte Shri Manindra MoMan Shrivastava. J.
°EI.O?.BOW
When the matter was cali (e l e d for hearing, none appeared for the
petitioner/s and the matter was pjassed over. Even in the second round,
none appears for the p^titioner/s.
Shri ^.'^S.^eL^^hL.f^. for the State.
{—
Earlier S.P.C. was issued tc the petitioner/s.
Since no one appears for ^he petitioner/s and no representation is
made on his/their behalf, the petiti^n is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Jude
Tumane
^n^
f':rf^ •;r^Tj
Rav
The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court