Dismissed
G.P.Sahu v. State and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/1574/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
6s BEE'ORE 2HE M.P. SZ&TE AEKIHIS'J'RASIVE…
What the court decided
AI extract
6s BEE'ORE 2HE M.P. SZ&TE AEKIHIS'J'RASIVE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
L6f( .$315 yi' 6s
BEE'ORE 2HE M.P. SZ&TE AEKIHIS'J'RASIVE T&IBUSfiL PRIl'iCIPAJj BEHCH &T JABALPUR. 0RIGIBIAL AE'PLICATION SD. '[ Z.<^- 1 /1997 PEEIIIOHEi.! Gopal Prasad Safau, aged ataoufc 35 years S/o Shri Rathrsn Sahu S/o Village Kharond , 1'iwar'i Saca Distric-b Bilaspur (M.P.) . V/S RESPeiiIDEH'rSs 1. State ®fM.P. through the Secretary, GQVt. Of M.P., Scfao®l Edaeation Depactment, Mantralaya Vallab^ Bhawan» Bhopal• 2. The eoiaamiss ioaer» P.Bblic-InstructiQQ, M.P., Bbopal. . 3. •Ehe Jeint Oirector, E'ablic insfen-ictieB, Bilaspuc. 4. The Deputy Birector School Educatian Edueat.i.on Division, Bila3par. SFPLIC&TIOH U'NOER SEC£JOS_1.9_OE_SHE_AGMIHIS'ERAIIVE IRIBUHa[<'SACr,l985s - ^ i3E'EAILS QS APH,ICA'IION 1. Particulars ®ffehe pe'bitioners &P detailed in eaiise title abave. 2. Particulars of the respsindentss &s detailed in cause title abeve. ^ 3. Particulacs »f ordef against wlu.eh tbe applicatioa is mades Sfae applicati@)a is being filed claiming a sirailac directien as is givsn ia ©fehercases,
• »£«•
"sss"
-•naak—
I-HC-22
•3^ ^ll<<ld<](, ^Tilti'ld. PlCII'M^ ^
3'n^?r 'cra^?
VSJ.:f.-.&lF^';..).$l?.yjL
K|l|(-fT aiHlch 2WS~"
'fN^ET'
'fe?ira'3niR?sir^f^T <+ii<)i^<A-i ^WvS ^ fscS <Rat^i<
STT^I TOHW ;trf?(T
•°^w^fta ^STfiOTSII^I
SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra MoHan Shrivastava. J,
c^^-/2010
When the matter was calfeIfe d for hearing, none appeared for the
petitioner/s and the matter was fjassed over. Even in the second round,
none appears for the petitioner/s.
Shri =?.al?-5LS-u^te^.—) fbr the State.
}—
Earlier S.P.C. was issued t4 the petitioner/s.
Since no one appears for |:he petitioner/s and no representation is
made on hisAheir behalf, the petitifin is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Judge
Tumane
FS S )!
i
v^'
i -.q^ .-^•rr-i
Gopal Prasad Sahu
State of M.P.
The Commissioner, Public Instructions, M.P.
The Joint Director, Public Instructions, Bilaspur
The Deputy Director School Education, Bilaspur
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court