This judgment dismisses a writ petition under Article 227 as infructuous. The court held that the petition was of no legal consequence and hence dismissed without elaboration on merits. No relief was granted.
the writ petition dismissed as infirm.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MC'^Y M^^.y
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
W.P. f227) No. 6 Jb^ /2010
PETITIONERS /1. Defendants no. tto6
-4.
?^ ^.5.
^s^
6.
^t'^-"y
Jan Bai aged about 57 years, widow oflate Ghurau Das, Shiv Das aged about 30 years, S/olate Ghurau Das,
Laxmin Bai aged about 34 years, D/o- Ghurau Das, Kirtan Das agedabout22years, S/o- late Ghurau Das, Teras Bai aged about 21 years, D/o- late Ghurau Das, Lakheshawri Bai aged about 18 years, D/o- late Ghurau bas, All R/o- Village- Leemgaon, Tahsil Kartala, District- Korba (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS 1. Plaintiffs
Thanda Ram aged about 58 years, S/o- Kislal,
Akshay Kumar aged about 45 years, S/o- Kislal,
Res.No. 1 & 2 R/o- Village- Tunda, Tahsil Kartala, DistriCtKorba
(C.G.)
Defendant no. 7 3.
StateofChhatisgarh,
Through the Collector, DistrictKorba (C.G.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
XI-HC—78
'7ST ^TFTT^R, ^>xll •Hj l<o, 1^TRT3T ^,^^^^:l^llf.l£./.^ NWytr^N^""""""""'""""""""""""""""""^ 200
3TI^T'l^F (1G'^<i^)
W^T^T'f^ri^ 'sRT^feNh "^R^ff ^ fexst <r<?i^i<
^ctTW^^ 371^1 '^'3tRR3^T
^f^TW^T^^
SB: Hon'ble Shri Prashant KluriarMiMfcshra, J.
27.10.2010
Shri F.S. Khare, counsel for| the petitioners.
Shri R.R. Sinha, PL for the |State.
Leamed counsel for the betitioners submits tiiat fhe writ
petition has become infructuous.
It is accordingly dismissed ^s infiiictuous.
Sd/-
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Judge
^
^.
-}-.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India stands infirm the before this Court being infirm in maturity.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jan Bai and others
Plaintiffs
Thanda Ram and others
State of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
