Disposed

Biharilal Saw and Ors. v. State of M.P. and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC5 Mar 2010WP/332/1998

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an order accepting the prayer for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to recur, the Court dismissed the withdrawal application made on behalf of respondent No. 4 without disposing of the underlying petition. No relief was granted in this order. Quality: thin.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for withdrawal of writ petition accepted with liberty to recur before the Board of Revenue.

Biharilal Saw and Ors. Vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Chhattisgarh HC (2010)

¶1

^
r IN THE HBGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR
W<P< _No?3 </ 1998
Petitloners t l® Biharilal Saw s/o Balaram
Saw aged about 38 years.
2o. Devnarayan Saw s/o Balaram
Saw aged about 36 years
3^ Jagatram Saw s/o Balaram
aged about 34 years
petition^rs 1 to 3 are
agriculturists and resldent
of Village Barkachhar PeC, No,
43 ^ P ^G ^ Hami rpur ^ Tah <
Gharghoda^ Sist<. Raigarh^
Vs.
Respondents ? 1< State of Madhya Pradesh
through Secretary^ Revenue
Department^ Vallabh Bhawan
Bhopal <.
2^ he Collector^ Raigarh
Dist. Raigarh, M.P.
3. The( CivilSub Divlslonal), GharghodaOfficer, '
©ist» Raigarh, M.P.
4^ Smt^ Budhni d/o Dhurau
Dhanuhar aged about 45 years
^ ^ 5- Smt» Sundari d/o Dhurau
^hariuhar aged about 43 years
^ respondents no^ 4 & 5 are
residents of Village Kasadol^
k
P^S^ Tamanara Tah^ Sharghoda
Dist» Ralgarh, M«P.
WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

¶2

:C-22 ^"^r^{^|t^||d<LI,} ^Tll^^^.^{^^ll^iy}

¶3

<^' ^)

¶4

51SIT^T^{T75T^} W-f-r^o- ^3>z-/ ^l^dt ^^j^--'t——t—r—^F^-200^"

¶5

	'f^R^T"
^n^i^T f^wsni^T 5h^icb ^if^a	^TT^T'^TT^R ^{^RfeT}	cni^f<n<fli ^{'RTH^f}^fe^ <F3i^i< ^3tf^W3TI^T
or	S.B. Hon'bleShriJusticePrash^ OS.03.2010. ShriKurolDas, counselfor Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. No.ltoS. ShriA.N. Bhakta, counsetfo^ Challer^e in thte wrrt petiti^ Add^ionalCollector, Ra^arhon 17	The respondent No. 4 has by the Board of Revenue as Ani^ ttot a revlsion fited by the petitior
^	Prayer for wittwlrawal is aforesaki.	accepted with the liberty as Sd/- prashantKumarMishra Judge

¶6

¶7

[TT^^{s.n^^}

Biharilal Saw and Ors. v. State of M.P. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Biharilal Saw and Ors. v. State of M.P. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nazima Begum and Others Vs Abdul Zaheer and Others

Subhas Chandra Vs Smt. Munni Devi and Ors.

Churaman and Ors. Vs Roshanlal and Others

B.Srinivas Kumar Vs B.Krishnamurty and Another

Laxmi Narayan and Anr. Vs Bali Ram and Ors.

Mongra Bai Vs Devanand and Ors.