This court dismissed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code for want of prosecution. Issued summons to the appellant, who failed to appear on two hearing occasions, resulting in dismissal.
Disposal of the second appeal for want of prosecution by dismissing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W/Mz/MyagéIJIyI/I/I Sing1eBerxcin {CL:. . SECOND APPEAL NC§>1 1994.
APPELLANT : Munnalal Verma,aged abcut 60 years, Son 0f shri Sunderlal verma,Tail¢r by occupation, resident of Halwa i Lane, RAIPgg. (M.P. ).
VERSUS RE SPONDENT : Smt. Mahorama Devi Kh§;e,aged about 57 years, Widaw 0f shri’Lalta Prasad§ Khare, resident of Halwai Lane, RAIPgg. (M.P. ).
SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION IOOOF QIVIL EROCEDURg CODE AGAINSTTHE JUDGMENT &DEGREE PAS§ED BY SHRI R.L. JHAWAT, IIVTH A.D.J.,L RAIPUR IN FIRST A?PEAL NO. 58Ag90 — MUNNALAL VERMA—Vs— MANORAMADEVI KHARE ’ ON 15—4—1993o
\‘é 5" V
3.3. Han’ble Shri Justice Prashant' Kumar Mishra 03.()3.2010.
None for the appalant. an the absence 9f counse for the appenant §his Court had Esued S.P.C. to the appeliant on 5—01 2010 in: today’s hearing. Today, the matter was caied twice andLboth ihe occasions : none appeared €or the appeuant This Ceurt is left with no other aption, but to dismiss the appeal r want of prosecution. Accordingiy, the appeat is smissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/—
Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge
we. «We w seq 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal can be disposed of for want of prosecution in the absence of the appellant.
Munnalal Verma
Smt. Mahorama Devi Khare
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
