The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the fixed date or on the second call, leaving the court with no other option.
The second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
'^
ViSSK^S
^N»inl ^s^ii^i^iSsiM.iii;L£;^&it^^2^^S^^
•^^^^ ^l^l^^l.-I^^I^I^JIIIjl^S^^
:iSSSiiS&S!SiliSii3ii^^
^
:;N
m :^5^^:,:^1
i- w ^^•^:
m ff ^;^l
®i®i^i
iiiiiiiiSiiii
•^f?'^,
^:;^^:'^M^^:'^^^
^^^^•iMr[ :s%r^:^lii%iiijli.f;:
.-%^%^%^1%:11..•t^i'liii^ asi
/
^t^p^
^lli ^^^
l®iI^ISi;Biil% lf ^;^^^^ asii
'•,:,?::.^:[^:^ ^^
ii^iiii^iiiu
^^^•^ :M^ill
'ilii1
IJIiiill
^ilil:SiilSl^illlii^
T^i'ti^i^^
^^ !MSS'^mi:S.
^;^^^^^j^';;:.-'.:/:1^^ liilSltil
^^ w^
m^SK I'JiiJtlii ^^ M
^®as:-? WS-S&iSS&M
Mil
II:liiii
»%N'l
l^lffit
i^^ii;
V. fi^iitiiii?aiiiiNiia%s%8!ss:issajsg^^
^®
^sr ^|{<4ld<LI, ^nl^^Ko. f^Krii^y
3'!T^?T tra"^ _£'.d.:..^.:.<.^ ^rWTT $b*<|ch 200
'f^R^ST'
| ^n^T^T 'f^rw^n^T 5^^ict) ^if^a |
^TT^T'^TT^R^rfin | CM^{<rl<fl'1 'HFToTf^fe^ <F3l^l< '^3rf^m3?n^T |
|---|---|---|
| S.B-: Hon'ble Shri Justice PrasH 8-3-2010 |
ant KumarMishra | |
| None appearsforthe part |
les. | |
| The matter was passed | representation on behalfofthe No one appears for the Fixed date S.P.C. was is^ 2010 fortoday's hearing. s |
|
| In the circumstance, Court but to dismiss the second The second appeal is ther 1 disr |
^ is no other option left with the |
|
| Sd/- PrashantKumarMishra Judge |
Gopal
[^^f^
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution on account of absence of the appellant.
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
