In this miscellaneous appeal under Section 73 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur examined an application for withdrawal of the appeal. The court allowed the withdrawal upon hearing the applicant.
Application for withdrawal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No order on costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1i y g
M /
gEFQRETHEHow-EmcHHATTmGARHHEGH_g9pRTogwvggATURE
AT BILASPUR .
M.A.No.3§}72002.
Raghu Raj singh s/o mesh Raj Singh, Aged about 28 years, R/o Bendimula, Ratanpur, Tah. & Distt. Blaspux‘i (C.G). Anand Madhav s/o Shiv Kumar Pandey, Aged 35 years, R/c village Madanpur, Tah. Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G§ .
VERS US RESPONDENT§ .Q/l. Santi Bai w/o shiveharan Sarthi. (V2. Bhola Ram 5/0 shivcharan , Aged 15 years, Minor, Through Guardian an shanti Bai w/o shivcharan. Both R/o village Bharari, P.s Ratanpur Tah. & Distt. BilaSpur (C.G). f / g MIISC. AP?EAL UNDER SL‘KONT $73 OF MOTOR VEHigJE ACT 10.88.
} 3.3. Hon’ble shri Justice N.K. A
12.07.2010
L
Shri MK Baeg, Advocate fOI ' appellants.
None for the respondents.
Heard on lA No. 8090/03
. application for withdrawal of the
ia‘bp‘eal.
On due aonsideration, the application is allowed and the
appellant is permitted to withdraw
he appeal.
Accordingly,
> the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No
0rder asto costs.
1(
\ /
Sd/v
N. K. Agarwali. kg
Judge
arma'mt ain‘ta‘ gamma, r,.-;:».;q$z.wria »»|vS/i47_2/2ilxll sinoomvo.
wRm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for withdrawal of the miscellaneous appeal deserves to be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raghu Raj singh s/o mesh Raj Singh
Anand Madhav s/o Shiv Kumar Pandey
Santi Bai w/o shiveharan Sarthi
Bhola Ram s/o shivcharan
N. K. Agarwali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
