The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act for non-compliance of the order dated 04.01.1999 requiring an affidavit in support of the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 04.01.1999.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C9
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH
CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J.
M.A. No. 1320 of 1998
Appellants
Claimants
1 Dhanmati‘ W/o Late Saradhuram Kalar, Aged about 35 years
All resident of village Nevata, Tehsil Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar (MP).
VERSUS
Respondents
1 .
Mahesh Markam, S/o Punaram, Aged about 37 years, R/o Tikarapara, Raipur (MP).
Misc. Appeal U/S
173 of the~Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Present : Shri Santosh Bharat, counsel for the appellants.
ORDER
(s‘hApril,2010)
The foilowing order of the Court was passed by
Rajeev Gupta, C.J.
This matter is listed today for orders on the appellants' default in filing the affidavit in support of the appiication for condonation of the delay in tiling the appeal. 2) The appellants were granted two weeks’ time vide order dated 04.01.1999 for filing affidavit in support of the application for condonation of the delay.
if
subbu
the order dated 04.01 .1999.
w/
T]
. W
Sd/—
‘R.N.
Sd/f
iiiagéirakar
Chief JuStiCC
, g f“
, 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed despite non-filing of the requisite affidavit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhanmati W/o Late Saradhuram Kalar
Subhash S/o Late Saraduram Kalar
Ku. Mati D/o Late Saradhuram Kalar
Subram S/o Late Saradhuram Kalar
Suvavan W/o Late Sadashiv Kalar
Mahesh Markam
Rajeev Gupta
Rangnath Chandraakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
