Appeal filed under Section 96 CPC. Respondent G.A. appeared; appellants absent without representation. Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution.
Appeal dismissed as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^
b
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
F.A.NO. W OFZOlOfDBl Qni'M,
INTHEMATTEROF:
^.R.to........../.6/^/^
PressatEy, »y Sw^....S^ Oa]ed...;..^.g?..^j^;^-a / Woti Lal BhalekarAge 75 year'u'"'""""-/--- •-
^ APPEALANT
S/o Late Chadan Cast Maharastrian
Mahar Business Agriculture,
Residence Makan no, H/178 Birsa Nagar
Dist. West Sinh-Bhumi, Jamshedpur (Jharkhand)
VERSUS
^RESPONDENTS L Mrs Kalyani Tiwari Age 60 year
W/o Ashok Tiwari
Both Residence of Bodhpunj Karbala Road
Juna Bilaspur (C.G.)
State Of Chhattisgarh
Through: Collector,
Bilaspur (C.G.)
^ APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH
ORDER XXI RULE 104 OF CODE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
,0 ^
XI-HC—78
'3S[ -4|^|dA|, ytily'Ko, fsKliyy
F'A.7<S^010
| an^i 'v^; (1°<{3l's<4tT) |
|
|---|---|
| 3II^?1Wk-f' ^f^ STT^T sbqicft |
'S^RR^ltel 311^1 ct)i^i<t41Ti TnIT^ff^^St <.f^i^,i< ^TsiRnan^iT |
| D.B. Hon'bte Shri T.P.Sharma and Hon'bl&Shri R,LJhanwar,>Jj! 04.08.2010 |
|
| None forthe appellants. Shri Sushil Dubey, G.A. forth^ Thecase was called out for h^aring nor any representation is made on b^ !n the absence of any repres^ no option is left with this Court excepf Accordingly, this appeal is dis |
|
| Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd!- R.L. Jhanwiar 3U(lge |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PressatEy
Mrs Kalyani Tiwari
Mrs. Vatsala Tiwari
State Of Chhattisgarh
T.P. Sharma
R.L. Jhanwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
