|aiAsTcRrfeira)
3IT^STq3^(ljc|f|gc|^)|
|---|---|
|(iaTr3ii^aTn;qra>
s^iTw^if^raii^r|l^rd41'l1K1riTtffe<<Sl^RI^K
?'3I^»T3II^?T|
|S.B. Hon'
sn,»i
Shri Viprasen Agrawa!, A
The instant revision is
17.07.2008 passed by District
10-A/07, by which the appeal
order dated 16.07,2007, passe
Ambikapur, in civi! suit No. 20-4
application preferred by the af
CPC was dismissed as barre<p
application for condonation oftj
Heard on IA No. 1 , appli^
Shri Agrawal, iearned cit
would submitthat the applicanf)
in preferring this revision withii))
delay occurred in filing this revj
Having heard the couji
having perused the order imptji
grounds taken in the applicatic|
find any substance in the appli|
The appiicant preferrecj
his name in place of decease|j
'days. Thetrial court, on due (jo|^ivocate for applicant.
flirected against the order dated
^udge, Surguja, in civil appeal No.
^as been dismissed affirming the
p by the tlnd Civil Juage C!ass-l,
/07, whereby and whereudnerthe
(plicant under Order 22 Rule 3 of
by 141 days, by dismissing the
elay in filing thesaid application.
ation forcondonation ofdelay.
iunse! appearing for the applicant
was prevented by sufficient cause
the stipulated time, therefore, the
sion deservesto be condoned.
sel appearing for the applicant,
gned and a1so having perused the
n for condpnation ofdelay,
1 do not
;ation.
the application for substitution of
plaintiff which was barred by 141
nsideration ofthe facts, dismissed|
