Ajoy Mukherjee v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
(S) U9S2> 2009 Petitioner ^ .N^if^/^^:ii-%::…
(S) U9S2> 2009 Petitioner ^ .N^if^/^^:ii-%::…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORETHEHON'Bl..EI-11<3HCOURTOFCHMATTISGARH ATBIl.ASPURfC.G.)
WRIT PETlTION (S) U9S2> 2009
Petitioner
AjoyMukherjee,
aged46ygarSt
^
.N^if^/^^:ii-%::
^^^^
-* -t / X ,'
^^;..>':^ ^
y
Resbondent - >/C1)
^/oKMukherjee Lectyrer(English)
Govt.H.S.S. DondiLoharg,
Tah. Dondi Lohara, Ckjstt. Durg (C.G.)
VERSUS
State Gpvt. of Ghhattisgarh
Thrpugh - The'Secretary
School Educatjon Deptt.
D.K.S.Bhawan,
Raipur'(Q.G.)
t ' • .• ; • • . .'.'.''.
A2)
DirectorofPubliclnstruction
State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Pension Badsi, Bairdn Bazar ;
Raipur(C.G.)
(3)
District Edycation Officer, Durg(C.G;) ,
(4)
Principal,
Govt. Boy§H.S. Schbol, Dondi 1-oBara
Tah. Dondi Lohara, Distt.Durg (e^G.)
»
^
F'ETITION UNEIER ARflGt.g 226 Qf: THE CONS1"ITUTIONJ3F INDIA. : ;" : ' ;:,''.: :. : . 1; :-•;: ;
,
j___EABIld-u-Aa<-<"--=uu~"—
'-HC—78 T=T '^WW^, W»\W , fqclKI^ ..w.-.fi Wtl (t>*lt<h
y
stl^T'q^; ('^3'^*')
3tI^I W ft-ti°b ^V 3^\ S»i*li<ft
wiiw ^iftn sn^i +l^<'l^'1 11H^i¥'^ f6<l <f3t^R ^?3lRTO3II^I
S.B: Hon'ble Justice Mr. Pritlnker Diwaker
11-08-2009:
Mr. B.K. Chakraborty,cq unsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Pane Lawyer for the State/respondents.
Counsel for the petition^i" submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition vith liberty to file representation before the competent authority againsjt the impugned order dated 24.7.2009/ He is permitted to do so.|
Accordingty, the writ petjtion is dismissed as withdrawn with the
liberty as aforesaid. Sd/| Pritinker Diwaker Judge
d/-
Ajoy Mukherjee
State Govt. of Chhattisgarh
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court