The High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding admission to the M.F.A. Graphics course. It granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation for grievances and directed the University to decide within 15 days.
Liberty to file fresh representation; direction to respondent to decide within 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
75ST ^I^KTl^, ^Til^^l^, [®l<ni<r(^<
^e^ t)
•HFWy ^SNl^^....^p.^.....^o...^.^....
^TI^I ^^T (^i^^?)
| ^^ "^? ^JCIi ^T^Ti^iCTN? |
¥^?w^teT3n^i | chs^41^'w^f^W^t <Fsi'^i< ^? ^ffip? 3?T^r |
|---|---|---|
| PETITIONER: -^ |
Ku. Rekha Prasad, Aged about 26 years, D/o S.N. Prasad, R/o C/o M.D. ShaJim, Ward No.5, Bareth Para, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajanandgaon (CG) ersus- |
|
| RESPONDENTS: | indira Kala SangitVishwavidyaiaya, Khairagarh, Through its, Vice Chancellor, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajanandgaon (CG) |
|
| indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyaiaya, Khairagarh, Through sts Registrar, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajanandgaon |
||
| 3. | Dean, Visuai Art, Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajanandgaon (CG) Head of the Department, Graphics, indira Ka!a Sangit Vishwavidyalaya, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajanandgaon |
|
| SinaSe Bench: Hon'bi 7-9-2009:- Shri Vinay Pandey, counsei f< Heard. The pet'rtioner by the instan respondent No,.1 to grant admission Grievance ofthe petitioner is above course duiy recommended |
Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. >rthe petitioner^ petition has prayeei for a directlon to tothe petitioner 'in M.F.A. (Graphics). that her application for admjssion to the by the Head of the Departmentjs^pot^ |
^iW^A ^NW ^"tl^ <M-li^lM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.
^s^^^
"3^? ^^—w,w^w^, fa^rey
Ni*i^r^WG^'
"^ 2,00
| 'S^:"-^TS' | 3Tf^T TF5[^ (1(j^f^^) ~T |
|---|---|
| ^^rr^" ^STi 8^^^3t^ |
I^TtW^Tf^'.3=TW ^T^f^n^iH^*^rft1^^T^R ^^^ |
| belng considered by respoipdent No.1/ University. She has also filed representation against non-c^nsideration of her application for admission to respondent No.1 vide Annex^re-P/S dated 15th Juiy. 2059, however, til! date, respondent No.1 has nottak^n anydecision on her representation. Learned counsel fori^e petltioner submitted that this petition may be disposed of with liberty to t^e petitioner to file fresh representation before respondent No.1 for the gr |
Sd/-
Dhirendra Mishra Judge
Ban/e
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to admit to the M.F.A. (Graphics) course.
Whether the petitioner can file a fresh representation regarding the grievance.
Kumari Rekha Prasad
Indira Kala Sangeet Vishwavidyalaya
Dhirendra Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
