High Court discharged the writ petition after the petitioners sought and obtained the court's permission to withdraw the application.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition and its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
...tf;"'a?
il"^'""^
^ l^1^^..'^«ife
i^.^6'i
^ f
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BIL^PUR
Writ Petjtion 227 No. 4190 pf 2008
Petjtioners
Versus
ResDondents
0/yrit Petition under Articte 227 oftheConstitutionoflndia.)
SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.
i W
Shri Rajesh Pandey, counsef for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
ORAL ORDER
(Passed on this 1 day of August, 2008}
Learned counsel appearing for the peUtionec seeks permission of ttiis
Court to wthdraw this petition.
Sd/' .^m
Satis^^^lbotn
Judge
ws is
Kapur Das
Kalyan Singh
Kemal Singh
The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pendra Road
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
