Disposed
In the Matter of v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWP/478/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
'1Ii' II1:^1 F^'KSs.'esiasijosers.s…
What the court decided
AI extract
'1Ii' II1:^1 F^'KSs.'esiasijosers.s…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
iS»^ a»B»U!ililIi|.!t|g!|'1Ii'
II1:^1
F^'KS s.'esiasijo ser s.s
^^?7/ a.BS.S'.3'^^ &>/"^ rf<?
Viv.
^~Q^'0"^'0"I M PSTtl9sa^
50/~3^."""^py)"70 Wfmaa
^Q/Q/7^> ^'
Ife^llC h&jK. l^
aajB. ifeiiaa. B^UE
Vl?»k»j>)>.Sj [l jUhlh t.[l>l.>jb|lb
> ^^..^^.....^^.Q.
^ tblhiB lUhlh
c^
>TiftlWI»J 'aiiftlP.®'h.Wlh.lb- te£
'Z)<3
C2JH. 'blhtB
l^llc. tb'll-bj
Ityif
ZZ-3H-IX
( i
^;
HIGH COURT OF CHHATflSGARHAT BILASPUR
DIVISIONBENCH
CORAM: HON'BLE SHRi RAJEEV QUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRlSUNil; KUNSAR SSNHA, J.
r^^wpZP70^ffZi^p^wT
Petitioner 's<in^£•^^njraj Pandey, Ambikapur Versus
Resoondent . Stateof Chhattisgarh
Present : Shri SumeshBajaj,'6ovemment Advocate forthsStats
Order (4th July,200S) ; The followlng order of the Court was passed by
Rajeev Gupta, C.J.
This writ petition came to be registered on the letter sent by one - Brijraj Pandey, resident of Ambikapur, District Surguja, highlighting the pathetiGconditions ofthe residents of rural area of district - Surguja on account of the non-availability of basic medteal facilities and medicines.
Sd/-
~^,^
Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha
Chief Justice Judge
Brijraj Pandey
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajeev Gupta
Sunil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court