Writ petition preferred under Article 226/227 for appeal against an order of the Labour Court. Court found the petition infructuous and dismissed it without further orders.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE sHRl JAGDISH BHALLA, Ag. C.J.
Writ Petition No. 722 of 2001
Petitioner Komal Kumar Chaubey S/o. Late Mahesh Prasad Chaubey aged about 4O years, Rio Purani Basti, Rani Road, Korba, Tah & Dist: Korba, Chhattisgarh. Vetsus Respondent: 1. Presiding Officer, Labour Court (Under MP. Industrial Re!ations Act), Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. MP. State Electricity Board, HQ at Rampury Jabalpur, MP. Through it’s Secretary. 3. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Beard, HQ at Dagania, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through it's Secretary. WritMPetition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndla Present: Shri MK Baeg, counsel for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passedon01 a August, 2007)
Learned counsel for the petitionersubmitted that this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
Acting Chief Justice
padma
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Komal Kumar Chaubey
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
MP. State Electricity Board
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board
Jagdish Bhalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
