In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prayed for a specific remedy. The court found that the alternative remedy under the law was available.
Allowed. State that the remedy is available under the law made available in the aforesaid matter found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
‘kam .4. i;mo
( CHHAT'L‘ISGARH > WRIT PETITION NO. 200 0
PETITIONER: litendrasingh Garcha son of shri Chanchalsingh Garcha; aged about 35 years; resident of Civil Lines. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). E. if
RESPONDEVTS: 1. The Raipur DeVelonntpe Authority. ( A body indcorpcrate unerd $.83 of Madhya Pdehras Naagi Tatha Garm Nivesh Adhiiy9)nam‘173 hiavng its office at G, E. Rd.ca Raipur. (Chttisgarh)ha ; Mr. Ahok.s Tiwari, Addionalit Tehsildar. Raipur (Chha t sgairh ) : Miss Ulna Pujari d/o shri B.L. Pujari aged about 50 years: resident ,.of M . G. Read , Raipur . (Chhatti sgrah ) Mr. Rajesh Pkr a sh Pujari son of shri B. .Pujari aged about 38yrs: resintde of M .G.Road. Raipur , z44{c¢£MZ(m M4 Mm IQWMIL W 11A WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTS.226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
XI—HC-22
| 5$f@‘2:‘2§67 | |
|---|---|
| 3m bi) Gum, counseE fer $hr'z S.L.3aja§, cpurgseE f0! i I None far i’espam‘em N02. $hri Ashish $hriva5mva, cc 3m Utkarsiq ¥ema, Deg: |
the peim‘onei espmden‘t M113. unsei fm a'espartdems No, 3 anci 4. uw Gavin Ameca‘ie §er @spencieni |
| §‘&G.§,’Siate. Learned eaahsei for me |
peiétmner prays wimerawa cf {his |
| pe‘iiiion wiih iiberty ie iake agpmp Ne? ogpesed. Ceasiderem‘. $eti'tion Es dismissed as witw léigm |
Aihwed. '§ate femedy avai§abie une‘er ifne iawa mfawn with aforesaid imam]. Vi ‘§ |
| in the of above. orc |
i ef, iA Nes, 59?3/2OU$, 772866‘ |
| 10649120G5, ’i20’i 3120061 23$ |
heme, 2438;2w4 ay/243H2904 A |
| stand disposed of, | Tl ’ Vijay Kumar Shrivastaye</sup> Sd/- Judge |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the remedy under the law was available in the aforesaid matter.
Ratendrasingh Garcha
The Raipur Development Authority
Mr. Atul Chauhan Tiwari
Miss Ursa Pujari
Mr. Rajesh Pujari
Vijay Kumar Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
