This is a thin order dismissing a miscellaneous appeal as withdrawn by the appellant. No substantive legal proposition or reasoning is provided.
Misc. Appeal No. 08/2007 dismissed as withdrawn; connected I.A. No. 441/2007 disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^ss» ^—^-
r
HI^H COURT OF CHHATTIS^RH AT BILASPUR
| Misc. | ADseal No. 08/2Q07 | |
|---|---|---|
| Single Bench: | Hon'bl | e Shri Dslip Raosaheb beshmukh/J. |
| APPELLANT | 1. 2. |
Storte of ChhGttisgarh, Through ; The Colleoctor, Raigarh, Tahsii and Distt;Raigarh (C.S.). Rent Control Auftfiority-cum-Sub Divisional Offlcer, Raigdrh Tahsil and Distt.Raigarh (C.<7.) VERSUS |
| Resj3ondents | 1. | Seth Kirodima} DharmadaTrust, Kaigarh.Through^ TheSecretary, Bhimsen Bhardwaj S/o Harbilas Ji Bhardwaj, aged Gbout70 years. |
| 2. | Ramesh Kumar Moda S/o La1^ Shri Purushottam bas Moda, aged about 58 years,President-Seth Kirodimal Charjtyf Trust, KQigarh, |
|
| Both^ are R/Q Raigarh, Tahsii and District Raigarh (C.&.}. |
||
| ^a | YUay Kumar Kediya, 5/o OmprakGsh Kediya, cged about 42 years, R/0 Naya &snj, RcigGrh,TahsiI and Distt Raigarh (C..5.) |
^r'v
' Present:
Shri Akhil Agrcwai, Pane! Lawyer for the flppeiiants. Shri Rajesh Pandey, counsei for respondents No. 1<& 2, Shri B.P. SharmG, counsel wil4i Shri H.S, Patel, counsel for respondent No. 3.
ORALORDEft
(Passedon13thMctrch,2007)
The foliowing oral order of the Court was by passed
Dilsp Raosaheb DeshmuRh, J.
N.
•^.^
^
Shri Akhil Agrawal, leomed Panel iawyer seeks permission to withdraw this Misc. Appea! in view of the order passed in Misc. Appeals No. 03/2007 and 04/2007.
disposed of.
Sd/Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge
State of Chhattisgarh
Seth Kirodimal Dharmada Trust
Ramesh Kumar Moda
Yam Kumar Kediya
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
