The order records a matter called out where no party appeared. It details the unserved notice due to an incorrect address for the non-applicant and sets a fee to serve a revised notice via registered post; otherwise, the revision petition stands dismissed.
Issued notice by registered post upon payment of fee; otherwise revision petition to be dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A<
<®
0
Mk m m may
mw mg cma: m mbxcmgx Wynn: m2)
H '
cIVIL‘Rxv'Islém kb.L‘75_lj2,
r W
:
1. Babura‘m aged about ,3? years, I
W
son gr chhadilal Kumi;
/ ,
2. aattu aged about 28 years,
~
/ son of chhodual Karmig
a. chhednal aged about
W5 years,
son of sumara Kurmi ;
M
4 . sudMran ugad abeut 44 years ’
san of c§m§d11a1 Karma ;
5. Baluam aged abdut 45 yeere,
sen ac vhhedilal Knrni;
6 . Banshiran a d abeut 4e years '
sen er chr’aglal Kurmi;
7. Peramesiimr aged ebeut 33 yrs,
gone: Chhpéhel Kin-mi;
m “sweets or vuiage’mgan,
rahsn Bum, maneuupur.
‘ VQrSES -
3v Hahendra Km, aged about
42 years, son er Nattha singh-
Pan-jabi, resident ot'J'um,
Eilaspur, Krishna Hagar Ward,
Tah811 & ”13". Biusynre
XI—HC»78
h
HW,WW,W
O‘D
a? 200
WW(W)
| 3W1?3WM%W'W WWW |
MWH§HW | WWEWW éamsnésn |
|---|---|---|
| E‘s | ’ f 8.3.2907 When the matter is caHed out} nOne appeared on behaif 0f the app!isants as we“ as non- appHcant. In campiiance of order dated 21.12.2005 notices were ie‘eued to the hon-applicant, however, the same has been received unserved with an endersement that non-applicant irs not res'tding in the given eddrees. On submission of freeh process fee within seven days aiong with cerrect address of the the no—ap‘piicant by appiieente, , ieeue netice to the non-appiicani throUgh registered pest I in addition to ' usual mode et service, failing * Which the revision petition ‘s’hali stand dismieeed without furthet refetenceto the Bench. t ,1 . i Dhir |
Judge P.T.O. ' re, 7‘ sd/ J<br>endra Mishra |
XH.EOH\w
gg
E§‘%.§
n.h‘ \Q®\aa
§
Ncc
gwagAnmJwwmv
| magma? | 33mg? wig? |
|---|---|
| bkTOb‘ 6V . (R |
|
| QQSW “3%. 29 $m§®0 N1“. \Jx.“ nC\m ON QNM“§xhW®QAw ‘%~<br>0¥§§ noék§§mw @Xw bmJx $§§ akavx EAQW 96. o‘w‘o£. NBaN 0Ex9§k Q§L¥® ‘W\v&®x VEN¥ R\§QQ\</sup> <br>wm haSu GQQ§K V& XX boimxa Q08\k%%§. m&. M W \J. $Nné |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jendra Mishra
Dhir
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
