In a contempt petition filed for non-compliance of an order directing a decision within one month, the single judge dismissed the petition after the respondents submitted a compliant order dated 16.1.2007 and it was placed on record.
The contempt petition is dismissed; the respondents are warned not to recur to the same conduct in the future.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
y(li
^
IN THE mCH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.)
CONTEMPTCASENO.OSr /2007
( Arising out oforderdate 10.10.06 passedbyHon'ble JusticeShri S.K. Agmhotri in W.P. (S) No. 5$T2/200
ABPLICANT~7 ~
:^Budhawara Bai W/o Shri Kheduram R/o Chhoti Koni, Bilaspur; Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.)
VERSUS
CONTEMPTNOR
X>NAPPLICANT
/" Secretary, i Department of Publie Works, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)
Superintending Engiaeer, Department ofPublic Works, Bilaspur Division, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
'!"-'.,
APPUCATION UNDERSECTION215 OF THE CONSTlTCnON OFINDIA
K
HI6H COURT OF CMHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR
Contennpt Petition No. OS of 2007
Single BenchiHon'bteShri Satish K. Agnihbtri, J.
Applicant BudhawaraBtn
Versus
Respondents J.S. Dixit ond others
Ppesent:
•^'
Mr. S.P. Kate,counselfor the applicant. Mr. V.V.S. Moorthy, Senior counsel with Mrs. Aryu Ahuja, counset for the respondents.
ORbER ;th (Passed on 6T" bay of Ftebruary, 2(K)7)
Tliis Court, vide order dated 10.10.2006, passed 'm WP. (s) No. 5812 of 2006 (Budhawaro Bai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh ond others). direct'ed the concerned authority to decide the representotion within one month from the dtrt-e of receipt of the representtrtion. It oppears thct the representation could not be decided u(ithin the prescribed time. The petitioner has filed this contempt petition on 28.12.2006, statirg non-compliance of the opder of this Court by theconcerned authority. - -y* 2. . Mr. V.V.S. Moorthy, leorned counsel appearjng for the re.spondents/contemnors submits that in comptiance with the order of •Kiis Court dated 10.10.2006, passed in W. P. (s) 5512 of 2006, Public Works Department, Sovemment of Chhatti^arh, Raipur (C.6.) hos issued an order dated 16.1.2007. LetB'nedcounsel appearlrg for the reqaondents/contefflnors
TRS'
placeacopy(yftlTesotdorderdated16.1.2007befoTethisGourt'.'n'ie docunent is taken on record.
otherwise !t amounts to contempt of Court.
order as to costs.
Sd/-
Satish K. Agnihotri
Judge
Subh&sh
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed in view of the compliance of the earlier order by the respondents by 16.1.2007?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Budhawara Bai
J.S. Dixit
S.B. Solairid
D.K. Jain
P.M. Kashyap
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
